Uploader Comments (ChangeDaChannel)
Top Comments
-
@juramilt Has been awhile that I can say "Thats just a plain stupid comment" but now I can say it again. 'Conspiracy' Try looking up the big words before you use them. Start small spot. No need to embarrass yourself.
-
@ryn88220 Youre dreaming. You did not Debunk this video. NONE of the debunk episodes have ever been debunked. I welcome it if it happens but it hasnt. But keep patting yourself on the back and think the government is incompetent and cant even hide blow jobs as a justification for your extreme views. Now run a long. You have nothing to offer this thread but hot air.
Video Responses
All Comments (382)
-
@grandmastershek shek... do you really believe that four guys with box cutters took over four seperate jet aircraft.... thats is jsut the first of the insanity that has been feed to you.... four guys with box cutters... really!
-
@TheJamesvanmiert are you completely mentally deficient..... the evidence is complete and overwhelming to the highest degree... a handful of arabs with box cutters had no chance of over taking four jet aircraft and causing the damage that occurred on 9/11... ZERO chance, physics does not change, the government's account does not hold up to scrutiny!
-
@TheJamesvanmiert The NIST report does give a comprehensive explanation, however, their explanation is wrong. The stand out reason for me, is that the report fails to explain how, after 13.5 BILLION years, Newtons Third Law never applied to events that day.
-
Anyone that Thinks the Government is telling the truth about 9/11.
Answer these 2 questions.
1, Kerosene is Jet fuel, The Girders in all 3 WTC buildings were 22" thick Tempered Steel.
Jet Fuel Burns at 1200 degrees in a Blast Furnace, Steel melts at 2700.
How is it that Kerosene Heater work great and 22" Girders Melt?
2, The 20th hijacker, ZACARIAS MOUSSAOUI, FBI Testimony states that "No Calls were Connected that lasted longer than ZERO SECONDS.
FBI Testimony.
If NIST is right, explain this.
-
@TheJamesvanmiert NIST never tested for explosives (the most probable cause, firemuch more low probability), never explained the free-fall of building 7 for the first few seconds, never gave out their data on how they got their computer models to behave as they did, never explained the molten metal found at the base of all 3 towers. That's not a scientific investigation. That's a blatant cover-up.
-
@ChangeDaChannel It's hard to find stuff about this. Got several links, but mostly just message boards of people discussing it. At one message board, someone said they would "file a report" to find out who made the call and what not, but they never posted again. I'll look some more, but I'm surprised at how little info is about this on the net.



Do you have any idea why there are no credible scientists who support this? Are aware of the 10000 page NIST report that comprehensively explains the collapse? Do you know that your technique is called quote mining and do you not wonder where all the people you quote are now? There where no explosives found in the WTC buildings on 9 11. The 9 11 commission was lied to but do you think they believe it was an inside job?
TheJamesvanmiert 4 months ago
@TheJamesvanmiert Do you know what comprehension skills are? You should get some. I didnt talk about a collapse. I know where the Transportation Secretary is. Yes. There were explosives used that day. Yes. Listen to the radio transmission provided. The commission was lied to. Need not going any further on that one. The report isnt correct. Now debunk that or be on your way because youre doing what they call "grasping at straws".
ChangeDaChannel 4 months ago
I'm only going to comment on one aspect of your video, and that's the van(s) with a mural of planes or, a plane, crashing into the WTC. I've never heard about this before, so I did a quick google search, and so far, I haven't been able to debunk the radio calls. Very interesting indeed. Still kinda weird for terrorists, or anyone to be driving around with that mural painted on it on 911, or any other day for that matter. I'm gonna keep researching this.
redneckvideogamer 4 months ago
@redneckvideogamer If you find anything please come back and share. Its very strange indeed.
ChangeDaChannel 4 months ago
Change the channel indeed. Why did you leave out all the quotes of the Commissioners saying they believe the report was accurate? Cherry pick much?
grandmastershek 5 months ago
@grandmastershek perhaps because that wasnt their final conclusion? Comprehend much? grandmaster...lol...indeed not...more like grandturd
ChangeDaChannel 5 months ago 3