Constitutional Law Class -- Prof. David B. Cruz
Loading...
Loading...
18,263
Link to this comment:
Share to:
Loading...
- 2:54Advocating for Kids, Thanks to PILF Auctionby USCGould1 views
- 3:52Maine Human Rts Work -- PILF Grantby USCGould1 views
- 12:30PILF Auction Supports Summer Grantsby USCGould3 views
- 3:20PILF Summer at L.A. Public Defender's Officeby USCGould5 views
- 52:11Chapter 3 - Business Lawby GRCCtv32,869 views
- 8:00Criminal Law 1 Part 1by ralugers2,429 views
- 4:32First Week of Law Schoolby jessemnix53,676 views
- 58:03Constitutional Law Expert Erwin Chemerinskyby wlunews11,224 views
- 3:07A Day in the Life of a 1L Studentby UVALawSchool28,578 views
- 8:37What is Administrative Law?by JusticeEducationBC4,655 views
- 3:52UGA Law School - "Evidence Class"by AthensVideoInc2,161 views
- 9:50Constitutional Law Class 1 of 43by MrChrisMcPhail22,662 views
- 9:51The Rules of Evidence - Part Iby conexc3,578 views
- 7:43Sit in on Professor David Firestone's Environme...by VermontLawSchool4,448 views
- 9:53Birth of the U.S. Constitution 1777-1787by stanklos39,642 views
- 9:33Public Law - Lecture 1 - Part 1by cariblegal6,046 views
- 28:26Constitutional Law Prof. Frank Askin: Part 1by Queensdude3,177 views
- 9:30Constitutional Lawby cntemplelaw2,477 views
- 44:30Student Lifeby USCGould6,059 views
is this a freshmen class?
virginiatechfanx 1 month ago
Very wall said.
katheryncruz24 2 months ago
It seams to me if Congress is to regulate Commerce as he says, then the Obama & Holder fan culb have carried out Treason & Direct Constitution contempt in seeking to suit a fellow member of the League of common defense for seeking to secure the National defense from invasion, lets not for get then the guns walking matter would a Act of war with out the vote or concent of congress as well in violation of inter national law
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
the view point of the Congressional powers & the Commerce, & fire Arms & states right verses federal regulation! Gibbons V. ogden 9 Wheaton 1 {1824} As i understand it Gibbons V. ogden 9 Wheaton 1 {1824} was not over the 2 Amendment it was over the voluntary tax system that would become the home stead act , The 1824 Action was the regulation of the standard of money {currency} from state to state as to the fight of water way rights, that so became a match of the lighting fire of the civil war!
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
@BruceMichaelAnderson the lawyer was very smart to use US Title 42 usc section 1983 & 1985 and the views points of the enforcement Act history 1866-70
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
He is right the zones and gun laws are unconstiutional what he fails to say what views did so the supreme court use its the 9th Amendment unholds the 2 via views from the dick Act of 1902. declairs such anti self defense laws as unconstitutional. They have to declare it as such or The paid common defense of the league or {police} would not be able to come on sight ie the factors of common law & the views of the 3rd Amendment & Say HR 218 Schools are public land not private owned
BruceMichaelAnderson 3 months ago
The right to sue is everyone's right. Why look to a congressional act to pursue civil damages. Isn't that redundant. He was admittedly guilty, though not criminally punished?
marciahrn 5 months ago
Maybe if you tried pulling up Constitutional law.
Nataloff 6 months ago in playlist Education 2
Y is it when I pull up constautional law I only get white people hmmmmm
usaintltrade 6 months ago
Bright students can't remember to give their name before their answers...
LeperKing 6 months ago