March 27, 2000

John and Patsy Ramsey interviewed on CNN, publicizing their book Death of Innocence. Part one of two (the other part broadcast on March 28th), section four of eight.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• jonbenet
• john
• patsy
• ramsey
• cnn

[beejays11]

Come on John,haven't we all suffered enough?

Just admit to it,and stop wasting people's time.

[NicolaMG]

john says he cant imagine that they knew the killer, but they named neighbours and friends as possible suspects, so if he doesnt think they would have known such an evil killer, then why did they name close friends. i really think there are lies here

[trustice1]

@peteyguitarguy

eliminated? lol...

you dumb people pisses me off.....just because they found years later that degraded DNA, wha tis a partial and never will be match anybody. This fucking DNA could be from anyone..from the investigators police, friends...i mean..the ramseys and the police messed up, the whole crime scene.

And of course the DNA from the ramseys were all over the place!! 1. it was their home..2. he messed up the crime scene with his DNA after he found her,on purpose i believe.

[peteyguitarguy]

Again, DNA has eliminated these people. I used to think Patsy was involved years ago. I now strongly lean towards their innocence.

[TheCdog24]

How can anyone honestly think the parents are innocent. They are so guilty is sickining.

[dhom100]

@dianabxh this case has nothing to do with the Boston strangler case which is a very old case. their private investigator theorize that the killer hid in the house when they went to the Christmas party. it was a kidnapping that went wrong when JonBenet woke up and scream in the basement. a neighbor heard a child screaming late that night. police just blew it off. panicking, the killer choked her and hit her head and ran off through the broken window in the basement.

[dianabxh]

@dhom100 The parents are the primary suspects because the crime happened in their house. Why the police were wrong here? Why they could have been wright if the primary suspect would have been a mystery intruder who entered in the house from an unsecured window and door, did the crime, closed the door (because the police couldn't opened it) and left the house quietly without his suitcase, but leaving it as the only evidence (I do not think he was aware of his footprint on the mold)

[dianabxh]

@dhom100 Did the police prod the door, or John had the key? Did the private investigators found the killer? Do you think this murder seems as the Boston strangler case? The killer strangles the victims with a cord, and a fake killer accepts the crime. Both crimes are unresolved.

[dianabxh]

@dhom100 How the attorney knew that the police were not looking for other suspects? Or if it was so, the police did not decide that they were the killers. The police only could press charges against them. A trail would decided if they were innocents or killers. Since they were innocent, they voluntary could asked to be questioned by the police in the presence of their attorney.and not to refuse b/s the police didn't accept their conditions for a doctor and private investigators.

[dhom100]

@dianabxh you misunderstood what I said. yes it's up to police to catch the killer but their attorneys advise them the police were not interested in looking for other suspects. Boulder police already considered the

Ramseys as prime suspects. but the Ramseys knew they didn't do it and they wanted desperately to find their daughter's killer and a killer is running loose on the streets. They hired their own private

investigator. I'd do the same thing if it was me.