Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Queen's Speech Is Propaganda: Dec-28-2010 WideShut Webcast

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
1,088
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 28, 2010

Full December 28, 2010, WideShut Webcast on Resistance Radio, with Keelan Balderson; discussing the Queen's Christmas speech and the real implications of "sport" as a distraction from the New World Order; the death of Jo Yeates, and Swine Flu fear-mongering.

http://wideshut.co.uk
http://resistradio.com
http://blogtalkradio.com/resistanceradio

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (wideshutuk)

  • Effectively there is no British nationality in itself. There is no such thing.

    HELP

    Currency.

    National / island abbreviation.

    Country /= country.

    National + Citizen ? = there is no "national" = there is no appropriate term for "citizen"

    "Britain" = half the country, also all of the country, depending on if you could be bothered working out which the speaker means.

    GB, the UK international abbreviation, is just more than A MITE confusing.

    HELP. Get those people in power to change things.

  • @lecochonbleu Point taken, no need to spam the video. I don't disagree with you, and I have no respect for the british empire. I guess it's just semantics.

  • I find it sad that 8 million people tuned in to watch Eastender (more propaganda).

  • @Goodfightlads Ughh yeah, Eastenders is the worst of them all. I think the overall message is, human life sucks, you won't amount to anything, go to the pub!

  • The 'enterprise' of the King James Bible, Sport and Games?? What's Lizzy's game then? Charades?

    The most noticeable thing about this speech for me was that she did not mention the one person who this whole Christmas festival is meant to be about, Jesus. Not one mention did he get.

  • @HumanSayNo Well her title is "by the grace of God"... so I guess she thinks she is as holy.

see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • < 4 There is never a moment when this & more is not happening, here, this universe. It can be very hard to bear.

    Re Diana Spencer, Paris, etc. So I was there. I've seen it. I've been a victim. I can say so much. Truth should be heard. Here on earth is where the beings of torture torture before they go to the separate, endless torture place.

    And they're trying to include you, each person, in that place, into that place they plan for. Don't let them. Try to be true & righteous every instant.

  • <3 It is here. This universe. Here is only for final, ultimate separation of beings anyway, for rest of endlessness (heaven, purgatory, hell is Christian groups' simplistic translation)

    Satan (many beings of 1 mind, acting as 1) decided to try gain in universe's purpose to separate. In (& other ways)

    1 Pretending often he respects that to trick you to accept him

    2 Maximising evil here, to procure most terrible hell after, here his last chance to torture (or steal) those who really are godly

  • < 2

    ...What I was making clear in previous coments is: they've been & are specific beings. Specific forces, specific beings. The forces don't originate from nowhere - it takes conscious beings (in any realm) to make them. Specific beings to enact them. It's older than time of the universe, but always specific.

    ...

  • @permaveg

    Permaveg: "When i say dark forces i mean a luciferic conciousnesses".

    Yes, that's exactly what I was describing in my comments. But it's "the" rather than "a" "luciferic consciousness". The thing about the specificity of beings involved is a crucial point - they ARE Lucifer, they are "the lucifer". Satan is a group of beings - living, dead + not yet born.

    ...

  • @lecochonbleu As that illuminati puppet Kissenger put it so loveingly, "she was a loose cannon", after her murder, ie she would not toe the line,and basically too humane for the likes of them. When i say dark forces i mean a luciferic conciousness, it is apt lizzy is head of a church founded on egyptian pagan and other pagan beliefs.As one of the popes said once "the myth of christianity has served us well".

  • @lecochonbleu I agree, i dont see the windsors as the apex of this dark energy, not at all, but theyare perhaps one of the most visible signs of that force/energy. Their power is largely covert, very covert at times but i believe light is shining into their darkness they hide and operate in, some have exposed it all ready, not in the mainstream of course, it is out there in books like "The biggest secret" by David Icke ( great detail about how and why Diana was murdered) . Their secrets out !

  • < 3 ...The forces are vast, very involved + complex, + far from new. With more determination, probably, than any kind of venture you could name in history (alas). They exist all of the time like that.

    They existed from before any living person now was born on earth. They are specific. They existed from before time itself, very same forces, from the same, specific beings.

    So to say it's just the Windsors, I think, however they may've been involved (I don't know), is misleading, not accurate

  • <2

    ... One thing. Those Forces: "ritual" sacrifice of Diana Spencer, of a princess (I say by name only, though was a risk of perhaps becoming Queen & power if she would then actually take Ryl Prerogative seriously, or be involved in dissolution of a modern myth of a Monarchy.)

    Such sacrifice- not abstract, nor alone about a person, any person becoming Princess & in line to "throne". No, such a thing is very specifically against the very beautiful, caring, D. Spencer, because she was that way

  • @permaveg

    Yes, I remember that. You are not wrong. With the case of Diana's death on that night

    I wasn't really attributing that to Windsors though. But it's a big thing anyway, is INCREDIBLY well planned. If - Maybe you're right there. I don't know about the Windsors. Yes, "dark forces" phrase may just be a description of what someone's involved in, even meant to be threatening. There is something wrong with them anyway- able to take "royalty" lies day after day, always ignoring Ryl Prgtive

  • @lecochonbleu Princess Diana said to her psychic friend " there not human you know", refering to the windsors. You couldnt get much darker than this family. The Diana ritual sacrifice was a modern example of dark forces at work, killed on 31 aug, the night dedicated to Hecate under "The passage of the moon tunnel" Pont d alma tunnel, Diana the hunter,(in her case hunted) moon godess. Reverse the date ,13, she hit the 13th pillar, she disliked number 13 . A Royal Ritual Satanic Sacrifice. cheers.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more