NephilimFree simulation

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
3,150
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 30, 2010

This is a response to Thunderf00t's video, challenging NephilimFree. More specifically, this video illustrates the impossibility of what Neph suggests, and what TF is asking him to prove, without the need for equations, or any abstract science.

The program used in this video is called Phyzios Studio Pro.
http://phyzios-studio.net/Default.aspx

The song in the video is called Monday - Paracetamol, by Ulrich Schnauss

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • @UknowFeckAll how is this not scientific? atheists dont make up the laws of physics dude. they apply to everyone.

  • What an over kill, LOL, or you could have just written out Bernoulli's equation for an incompressible fluid,... oh ya, Nephie-poo can't handle real physics and math.

    Of course this will not make a least bit of difference for Neph, he'll just say your model is anti-science because of the great pressure of the rock above.

    Remember people, lying for "jesus" isn't a sin

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ihmen True, atheist don't make laws of physics, does it mean this nf creationist can create his own laws of physics? THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE.

  • Gong back to first principles, the water column will reach a height where force up = force down. Force up = Pressure * surface area of nozzle. Force down = mass of water * gravity. Since the mass of water is volume * density which is height * surface area * density, we have surface area on both sides of the equation, it cancels out. Surface area is irrelevant. First year, first semester physics does it again.

  • The surface area does not matter. The water in the reservoir underneath the mass pressing down on it does not 'couple' laterally. Only the water directly under the nozzle exerts force. In fact there is a force exerted by the water not directly under the nozzle but it is a friction or drag that would tend to decrease, not increase the height of the water column.Common sense 101.

  • Ah, Ulrich Schnauss. Great track.

  • These are the things that happen when you have a Retard Creationist taking dictation directly from God.

    Sometime you go to War in a crusade form God, or sometime you invent a Crocoduck or a Banana nightmare.

    I wonder how Nephi got to that hypothesis without realizing that if the water goes higher than what the potential energy stored in the rock allows, he can solve all humanity energy problem by just inventing a machine the drops rock on water and use the extra energy for consumption.

  • @IIXVXII I have no idea whose side you are on. Good luck all the same though.

  • @ourben I've decided I will make a video, because every video I've seen about this mythical fountain is wrong, including Thunderf00ts. I have yet to find one video that explains the physics correctly, so clearly, I will have to make one.

  • @IIXVXII Why don't you put your money where your mouth is and present some numbers so we can calculate how possible it is?

    Or did you do it already and realise it's physically impossible?

  • @IIXVXII First off, the simulation hasn't completed. Second, the water level relative to the 'rock' says the the density is higher. Thirdly, it's probably not a very good physics engine. However, you need to realise the enormity of the flaws in Nephilim's hypothesis before even beginning to worry about inaccuracies in this single simulation.

    There would need to be no atmosphere and no pressure drop out before it was even worth calculating how far short of the moon (very) the water would be.

  • @IIXVXII Ok, lets go with the rational line of thought, that the earth was split open by an all powerful god and water spunked into space causing the craters on the moon. And THEN god remade the earth so that no evidence of this cataclysmic geological event would be found. He covered it up, but wrote it in his book that he authored. Also, the water would have to have been propelled at such a force that huge moons of ice would form in distant planets. I am convinced.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more