Re: District of Columbia vs Heller and Gun Control

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
253 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 29, 2008

Video Follow-up to District of Columbia vs Heller and Gun Control

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 0 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • People, to protect our Constitution and regain our rights we need to

    IMPEACH.

    Check out afterdowningstreetDOTorg

    Lots to do through there like contact Congress and Senate.

    Send a free fax to Conyers and the rest of them at faxzeroDOTcom

    Call, email and fax your rep and members of the judiciary committee and DEMAND impeachment.

    Push the media to spread FACTS AND TRUTH.

    Take a look at freewaybloggerDOTcom and copy that idea.

    Or, crawl in a hole and pretend everything will fix itself.

  • I guess I'm not the only one who thought the Court was giving with one hand (declaring the 2nd an individual right)and taking with the other ("reasonable restrictions").

    If the government can dictate to us what a "reasonable restriction" on a freedom is--then what freedom do we really have?

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • You have the same Monitors I have, they are so awesome for the money, love your album, peace

    P.S. Gary Rocks

  • I am absolutely appalled by the fact that 4 justices ruled against the 2nd amendment. Congress should petition for removal of these justices. If Barak Hussein Osama gets voted in we may just get another communist justice, and God help us then. That vote should have been 9-0 in favor of the 2nd amendment.

  • Great video. Music truly is a great way to invoke people's emotions on the subject and get them behind our cause. I also agree that the Supreme Court Justices have been deciding cases on their political party stance and not being the final arbiters of the constitution that was intended. If the four justices were doing their job they would of ruled in favor of a individual right.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more