Jeff King MIT on 911 Part 2
Top Comments
All Comments (193)
-
"Shot in the dark"? You can get my age from my channel but, not my politics or race.
While you list your age as 67? Really?
The laws of physics are universal regards of ones age, race, or politics.
-
@NWOisBS Shot in the dark here, but are you a fifty something year old white republican?
-
@roodeey I would like to see a full Biography on this MIT Jeff King. He says he studied Physics at MIT and was an Electrical Engineer for 8 years. Mentions speaking with one of his -Patients- Sounds like this guy has some mega schooling background. Its not all clear exactly.
Is there a theory as to why the Truth Movement would be deceptive and misleading people?
-
@roodeey Do you keep track of the misinformation that you come across?
-
Most of the people are sincerely looking for the truth, yes, but, there is a huge amount of misinformation thrown around that gets accepted just because its supposedly from the Truth Movement. Don't just buy everything because its from the Truth Movement.
-
The title was changed- there still are clips that say Jeff King MIT Engineer- he studied electrical engineering I don't believe he is a professional engineer- Its a good presentation but where are all the structural engineers- the only people really qualified to explain the collapse- its like going to a dermatologist for brain surgery because he is a medical doctor. From everything I've researched- Jeff King graduated from MIT 1974 with a degree in Biology not engineering.
-
@roodeey Well as I pointed out already, the "truth movement" doesn't mean they are "Representatives of the truth" It means they don't believe the official story about 9/11 and are LOOKING for the Truth.
-
@roodeey Actually he Studied Physics at MIT and was an Electriical Engineer for 8 years. Where does it say Jeff King has a degree in something where he doesn't? I would like to examine your claim of "deception" and investigate it.
-
The church and The 911 commission say they stand for the Truth too and ignorant, gullible, naive people believe them as well. If one really starts to do their own independent research and puts the TM to the same level of rigorous scrutiny that the TM claim to put to the Official Story they'll find some people the TM are being deceptive as well. Passing off Jeff KIng an "MIT Engineer" is being deceptive- he studied electrical engineering at MIT- he doesn't have a degree in it.
-
@roodeey You misunderstand why they are called "The Truth Movement" They are looking for the truth because they don't believe the official story.
Some windows near the impact area did indeed survive the crash. But that's what the windows were supposed to do they're blast-resistant.
"A blast-resistant window must be designed to resist a force significantly higher than a hurricane that's hitting instantaneously," says Ken Hays, executive vice president of Masonry Arts, the Bessemer, Ala., company that designed, manufactured and installed the Pentagon windows.
If you look at photos you will also see windows(non-blast resist) broken out.
NWOisBS 2 years ago 7
"first in aviation history to have crashed and completely incinerated a plane" -CanadaForce
WRONG again. First the plane was not completeley incenerated, there was identifiable 757 parts found including landing gear, engine, and fusalage.
aerospaceweb. org/question/conspiracy/q0265. shtml
look here to see what fire can do to a plane even with best efforts to save it.
yeinjee. com/asianpop/airplane-in-fire-at-naha-airport-okinawa
Notice that the fuselage and port wing burned away?
NWOisBS 2 years ago 3