The Burial Cloth of Jesus

The Hungary Prayer Manuscript of 1192 illustrates what can only be the Shroud of Turin, predating the earliest possible date of manufacture calculated by the AMS Carbon 14 testing. This paradigm assumes that the radiocarbonists' claim that the Shroud of Turin is a 14th century forgery is correct. It is based on what that conclusion tells us about the forger. It tells us hypothetically that:

1. The forger first painted the bloodstains before he painted the image.

2. The forger integrated forensic qualities to his image that would only be known 20th century science.

3. The forger duplicated blood flow patterns in perfect forensic agreement to blood flow from the wrists at 65° from vertical to suggest the exact crucifixion position of the arms.

4. The forger "painted" the blood flows with genuine group AB blood that he had "spiked" with excessive amounts of bilirubin since the forger knew that severe concussive scourging with a Roman flagrum would cause erythrocyte hemolysis and jaundice.

5. The forger "plotted" the scourge marks on the body of the "man in the shroud" to be consistent under forensic examination with two scourgers of varying height.

6. The forger also duplicated abrasion and compression marks on the scourge wounds of the shoulders to suggest to 20th century forensic examiners that the "man in the shroud" had carried a heavy weight following the scourging.

7. The forger, against all convention of medieval artistry, painted the body he was "hoaxing" as Jesus of Nazareth, nude to conform to genuine Roman crucifixions.

8. The forger, as the forensic genius he was, illustrated the nails of crucifixion accurately through the wrists rather than the hands as in all other conventional medieval representations. He also took into account that the thumbs of a crucified victim would rotate inward as a result of median nerve damage as the nails passed through the spaces of Destot.

9. The forger was clever enough to "salt" the linen with the pollens of plants indigenous only to the environs of Jerusalem in anticipation of 20th century palynological analysis.

10. The forger was an artist who surpassed the talents of all known artists to the present day, being able to "paint" an anatomically and photographically perfect human image in a photographic negative manner, centuries before photography, and be able to do so without being able to check his work, close up, as he progressed.

11. The forger was able to paint this image with some unknown medium using an unknown technique, 30-40 feet away in order to discern the shadowy image as he continued.

12. The forger was clever enough to depict an adult with an unplaited pony-tail, sidelocks and a beard style consistent with a Jewish male of the 1st century.

13. The forger thought of such minute details as incorporating dirt from the bare feet of the "man in the shroud" consistent with the calcium carbonate soil of the environs of Jerusalem.

14. This forger was such an expert in 20th century biochemistry, medicine, forensic pathology and anatomy, botany, photography and 3-D computer analysis that he has foiled all the efforts of modern science. His unknown and historically unduplicated artistic technique surpasses all great historical artists, making the pale efforts of DaVinci, Michaelangelo, Raphael and Botticelli appear as infantile scribblings.

If the Shroud of Turin is a forgery of the 14th century, as the radiocarbonists claim, and not a genuine artifact of the 1st century, all of these qualities of the purported medieval "forger" must be accepted. If the Shroud was "forged" it would have to have been painted.

It is an irrefutable fact that there is NO paint or pigment on the Shroud of Turin leaving the only explanation of the technique of the forger to have used "photography" to manufacture the relic in the THIRTEENTH CENTURY!! Some authors have gone so far as to suggest exactly that. This is patently absurd!

CONCLUSION

The Shroud of Turin is a genuine artifact of a first century Roman crucifixion of an adult Jewish male. The radiocarbon dating placing the manufacture of the linen in the 14th century was flawed by extrinsic C14 accumulated over centuries of fungal growth, candle smoke and the intense heat of the fire of 1532. There is NO paint on the linen of the shroud and is not the artifice of a forger.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Jesus
• Christ
• Resurrection
• Science
• Proof
• Evidence
• Everlasting
• Life
• Salvation
• Died
• For
• Humanity
• Sin
• goudrons
• kurial
• kloth

[cryptsub]

You believe in this scam and you support McCain. Figures.

[Dr0pDuckC0ver]

So you don't believe in Jesus' resurrection and support Obama? Figures.

[cryptsub]

Correct, I'm one of those intelligent and rational-type people.

[Dr0pDuckC0ver]

Show me a picture of a rational person and an irrational person...to make it easier, show me a picture of a rational thought and an irrational thought empirically.

[TheBigGameHunter1]

It looks like a face when flat.

Oh wait it would NOT have been flat when on a body!

Let alone touching everywhere on the face.

[Dr0pDuckC0ver]

Exactly why the face area and the rest of the body image is not in a contact relationship with the cloth. The blood images on the other hand indicate contact image...the video addressed the "Off-body" image of blood that would have been a pool of blood at the elbow from the wrist flows of blood--indicating the cloth was wrapped around a 3 dimensional human.The body image was not contact formed but in keeping with a burst of radiation in an upward and downward plane.I am making a video on this.

[positron66]

There is only one man who came from heaven, came out from God and born into the world as the Son of Man and the Son of God. God manifest Himself in the Flesh. Jesus is the perfect Lamb from God to atone the sins of human race by His own Holy Blood. The Blood of Jesus which is alive & powerful to wash all sins. It reconcile men & women with God once again. Without the shedding of Blood, there is no remission of sins based on God's law. So the penalty of sin is death but Blood gives life. Test it

[tgamerlegend]

Godbegone there was no paint found on it and did you even listen to the video? One of the reasons it dated only 700 years old was because of fungal growth and smoke from fires that it was around. Im sorry no im not sorry but the evidence speaks for itself that this is not a forgery. I pray you find Jesus Christ because tribulation is coming and all christians will be gone before then. All unbelievers left and the only way they can be saved then is to die for their faith.

[cryptsub]

@XephiousFlash no, the burden of proof is on the person promoting the implausible theory. a negative proposition cannot be proven. does your jesus let you go around swearing?

[XephiousFlash]

@cryptsub @cryptsub Do you have proof that this was a scam and is a scam? Please stop trolling nonsense or sprouting bullshit when you don't find EVIDENCE to proof this is fake. This has got nothing to do with the political parties or white house president. Stop typing bullshit behind your monitor. Get a life and praise the lord. Foolish ignorant kid.

[XephiousFlash]

@HotRecordingArtist There's many reason's why Jesus was in fact real. Exorcism are one of those reasons. Jesus has the power and ability to remove demons from a person. This has been passed down till today. Priest use the name of Jesus to remove evil spirits.

[HotRecordingArtist]

Jesus is coming, nobody knows when, and when he does come, I will laugh at all the people that had scorn, and disbelief towards our Lord, the Holy Spirit Jesus Christ. It will be too late for them, because they are evil, and Jesus will leave them to die with all eveil, while other Christians that have glorified him, will follow him into paradise forvever.

[TheNogGaming]

illuminati tried to destroy it..just my guess! :L

[Nithralas]

It could be any dude who was crusified and beaten. That's why islam forbids images of their prophet/god, u won't get stupid theories. Not that I'm an islam..

[NoBrainz123]

@1GOD1JESUS

Scientifically and historically speaking the resurrection of Jesus Christ is a documented historical event based on about 500 eye witnesses. Lee Strobel discovered that.

[lizazoon]

The shoud is a fake, That`s why it was never endorsed by the Vatican. In fact a French bishop( Darcis) in the MIddle-Ages claims the maker confessed to him, that he made it. Unfortunately the name was never revealed.