What can you do? Hotel Rwanda

"Animals kill for survival...Humans kill for pleasure..."




What is there to say about this scene or the entire film?...A scene from a movie based on the mass genocide of Rwanda, "Hotel Rwanda." We only can hope that maybe now the rest of the world can see how important issues around the world is after seeing movies about genocide. I think this scene itself stands powerful enough and says much about the world... But what can you do?...

Category:

Film & Animation

Tags:

• Hotel
• Rwanda
• Don
• Cheadle
• Nobody
• cares
• UN
• 1994
• Rwandan

[lolhazard]

@iosanaheireann It wasnt France, it was Belgium!

[NachtCrus]

...... of course, in a sad video about a genocide, the comment section is filled with fags arguing about which country is stronger.

NEITHER, because of fucking nuclear missiles, so shut up and reflect on the genocide

[flighty1996]

@edavismookie25

Shut up you racist. What a pathetic comment. Many WHITE people stayed behind with the UN, Red Cross and Religious groups. I suggest you take a minute to think before making pathetic comments

[flighty1996]

Im not being cruel and i know what happened was awful there. But this is just a thought.

Can you really blame the French Foreign Legion and Belgium troops. It was their job to save EU residents (along with a few others). Thats a great example of how the EU should work together to save their own people.

Just a thought

[flighty1996]

@Freddyliciuos1

I think you should not put the blame on the Colonels. Both the Canadian and the Ghanaian and Pakistani Colonels along with their troops put up a massive fight against the leaders to stay in Rwanda. Ghana was actually punished because their UN troops refused to leave Rwanda. Im sure you meant no offence but i just want you to realise its not "The UN" its "The leaders of the UN"

[Freddyliciuos1]

The UN was a disgrace during this genocide. But the blame is not the UN's alone. France and Belgium - the former colonial powers - just stood by, while a country teared itself apart. The US didn't want to intervene because of their losses in Somalia, but they were not the only country with the military capacity to carry out a military intervention. Especially Belgium, who was the creators of the segregation that lead to this madness, is in my opinion one of the biggest siners in this conflict.

[villalba874]

If there was any real responsibility, it was to the UN. The UN is there to prevent that from happening. Instead it only absorbs corruption. The United States intervene in Bosnia, not the UN.

[UchihaGamer111]

@edavismookie25 Yes only Americans killed Native Americans. There was no French Indian War. And the Aztecs and Mayans are merely myths.

[MrconnorjGiedymin]

@mcrae90 OMG Ty sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo­ooooooooooo Much ive been listing to it.... ive been crying none stop.... O_____o

[mcrae90]

@MrconnorjGiedymin a million voices by wyclef jean

[edavismookie25]

Funny how all of the white people left...now why do you think that is?

[edavismookie25]

@mrAZcardinal Because their is oil there. That is a commodity that Americans and Europeans are willing to fight and die for. But if you mean fighting for people who can't fight for themselves well then you are living in a make believe world. These are Africans and the world does not care about Africa unless it affects them...sad but true..