GIBSON SG 61 REISSUE

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
13,868
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Oct 5, 2009

GIBSON SG 61 REISSUE 2007 PAF 57

Category:

Music

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (valterpedrosa)

  • i think the made an standard manual for all the gibson's electric guitars, just like fender does, there's a single manual for tele, strat including basses, there's just one, in this case i think only the cover is the same

  • Hey Corsair you miss the point and show your ignorance. what I'm talking about is a good value instrument to play not put in a bank vault somewhere and try and make some money. But obviously you dont recognise this because youre not a muscian but a investment banker. I bet if I gave you a guitar you would probably eat it not play it!

  • oh boy, you did not get my point, i am telling you that this guitar will be better with past years, not old or junky, this piece has a soul, you probrably did not play on an instrument like this for more than an week, i wasnt talk about money i was talking about tone, it will be better about 10 years, and will keeping better forward

  • I bet you played top dollar for that guitar,£1200? Simply because its a Gibson.You  were ripped off,Ive got a Jim Harley SNG 60 it plays brilliantly looks exactly the same,same woods, excellent quality and finish for a tenth of the price. Sucker!

  • @Edward1312 it is more than a guitar it is an investment, my grandsons will own an expensive relic instead of just an old guitar, got it?

  • Just got mine today!!!!

  • it is great, dont you think?

see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Edward1312 But many years from now that Gibson is going to hold its value MUCH MUCH better than the Jim Harley. Even if the Jim Harley is BETTER than the Gibson, still, there's just something to be said about having a Gibson. Name brand DOES matter! That's just how it is.

  • I just came in my pants

  • @70goldtop Why would he copy Gibson's guitar if he was such a great guitar builder?You can keep your junk.I'll keep buying and playing Gibsons(Yes I'm in a band and I do own seven)because I could afford them.

  • @Edward1312 People who pay big money for a genuine Gibson SG got ripped off because you got a Jim Harley cheaper?Must be another goofball Jew trying to save 2 cents.Why do you think your Jim whatever guitar has the same quality,sounds the same and looks the same as an SG?Because he copied it you moron!If it was as great as you say it is it would be it's own unique guitar.

  • @Edward1312 I think I prefer the SG Gibson then a copy cat version.Why drive a volkswagen when I can drive a ZR1 CORVETTE.

  • I have mine for several months now.Great guitar.OH! have you check out The new SG 50th anniversary guitar? In vintage Black.I heard its in back order for several months.

  • i hawe a gibson sg standard but i will probaly sell it and buy a gibson sg 61 resisue it looks and sound awsome!

  • @Edward1312 So what you're saying you couldn't afford a brand name?

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more