Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Correcting the Law Society Part1.mp4

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,860
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 14, 2009

The High Tech Board of Truth and Justice is back this time Freeman-on-the-Land Robert-Arthur of the Menard Family explains how Section 1.1 of the Legal Profession Act is miss-interpreted by the lawyers for their benefit and at our expense. Brought to you by The World Freeman Society and ThinkFREE.ca

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (mrmitee)

  • the comment box stays in the centre of the video and covers most of the law copies.

  • @2livepeacefully where do you mean? I will fix it if I can...

  • omegasher, I don't know what you are so concerned about. I gave her sufficient information so she would know where to direct my query. Should we not tell them what our questions are unless they are willing to answer it? Should we call them and say "I have a question but I can't tell you what it is. Now direct me to the right party to answer my question."

    They need to know what questions are being asked even if they do not know answers so they can direct to right party.

  • I don't think she can answer your question because it is antagonistic. If she was to answer it it would only be her personal opinion because it likely isn't written in the policy manual that there is discrimination between officials and their power and authority. Of course the only reasonable answer to your question is no.

  • Then we see she refused to be reasonable. I did not mean to be antagonistic, but if they would simply answer questions honestly there would be no antagonism at all, nor need for it.

see all

All Comments (53)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The squeaky toy always puts a smile on my face. Thank you R.A.M. for posting good data.

  • you needed to have her confirm someone WILL be phoning me back and get her name and or security or id number and a reasonable time frame. not a maybe. they work for us right?

    LOVE THE VIDS ROB

  • hi rob your videos have effectively changed my entire perspective of life i live in pennsylvania but the language you speak is universal and just as compliant here as it is in canada thank you so much for the most valuable education ii am currently setting up a paypal account and will surely make a donation may god and peace be with you

  • @mrmitee

    yea during the whole video you have a caption box that says "Enter your text here". Just remove annotations from the video if you can.

  • rice is siyonide

  • the box shows up when the first copy stuff shows up and carries through 1/2 way through the vid. says enter your text here. :)

  • You claim at the beginning of the video that you are asking "whether or not the section of this act is applicable to people who aren't lawyers."

    Yet you don't ask her that. Instead you ask her a subjective question that can only be answered by opinion. When we have already established you already know the answer to the question you claim to be posing, that you do not actually pose. Sound like you're using the old bait and switch there Rob.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more