10 Really Bad Youtube Objections to the Kalam Cosmological Argument

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
6,940
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 27, 2011

http://reasonablefaith.org - These are the top 10 really bad youtube objections to the Kalam Cosmological Argument*:

# 10 - "A God is not needed to create the universe, the universe created itself."

# 9 -- "KCA is nothing more than a 'God of the Gaps' argument."

Bad Refutation #8 comes in five parts because they all speak on the identity of the First Cause.

# 8a -- "How do you know God caused the universe? We don't know what caused the universe but it sure as hell ain't God."
#8b -- "It doesn't make sense to describe something in negative terms."
# 8c -- "Ha! Ha! You just made an argument for the Flying Spaghetti Monster as the cause of the universe! Who knows, I can say it's an invisible unicorn that caused the universe. You really don't know if God had anything to do with it!"
#8d -- "You don't know if this God is the God of Christianity, Islam, or Judaism. What good is this argument?"
#8e - "The KCA doesn't argue that this God answers prayers, forgives sins, reads our thoughts, etc."

# 7 - "The Kalam Cosmological Argument commits the fallacy of composition."

# 6 -- "If the actual infinite cannot exist then how can God exist if he's infinite?"

# 5 -- "The KCA engages in circular reasoning and begs the question."

# 4 -- "The Kalam Cosmological Argument is guilty of equivocation."

#3 - "The First Law of Thermodynamics (the conservation of energy) refutes the first premise of the Kalam Cosmological Argument that whatever begins to exist has a cause."

#4 and #3 again -- "KCA, The First Law of Thermodynamics, and Equivocation."

# 2 -- "Quantum Mechanics proves something can come from literally nothing."

# 1 -- "Since everything needed a cause, what caused God?"

All responses made by William Lane Craig.

For more defenses against objections of the Kalam Cosmological Argument: http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=916E17EE70E98A68

Look out for William Lane Craig's own top 10 list of really bad arguments against the Kalam Cosmological Argument- "Objections So Bad I couldn't Have Made Them Up (or, the World's Ten Worst Objecctions to the Kalam Cosmological Argument)": http://www.amazon.com/Come-Let-Reason-Christian-Apologetics/dp/1433672200


=========================

* - The following syllogism is the Kalam Cosmological Argument:
Premise 1: Whatever begins to exist has a cause.
Premise 2: The universe began to exist.
Conclusion: Therefore, the universe had a cause.

Note: Reasonable Faith is now managing the drcraigvideos YouTube channel! We invite you to comment on William Lane Craig's videos in the reasonablefaith.org forums at http://www.reasonablefaith.org/drcraigvideos

  • likes, 58 dislikes

All Comments

Adding comments has been disabled for this video.

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more