Top Comments
All Comments (75)
-
good video to show why to be concerned less about CO2 and more about these chemicals mentioned in this video:
watch?v=aKOSiYWwcio
watch?v=-zeGY8zbzc8
watch?v=ztvxGbH8Mqw
watch?v=JTSxubKfTBU
watch?v=SvcuylMrkXk
-
take a look at the site: icecap (dot) us ...and then the page: /index.php/go/faqs-and-myths . I'm not saying every there is true but they raise some points that should be researched. . Also look at the video: watch?v=ztvxGbH8Mqw . CO2 will always be produced by some of our processess, but it does need to be reduced, but not in an alarming way. Again the earth can stabilize CO2 by increased plant and algae/ plankton growth. Toxic chemicals kill and last for years/decades until they biodegrade.
-
@mikepalomino NASA GISS data, the South Pole winter (June/July/August) has cooled about 1 degree F since 1957 and the coldest year was 2004.
.
Antarctic Ice Sheet is growing and covers some 5million square miles, twice as big as the U.S. It's almost 100 times bigger than all the rest of the world's glaciers put together.
.
90% of the world's glaciers are growing, but we hear about the ones melting.
.
I was a Greenhouse Effect activist for 10 yrs; but there's new evidence in the last few years.
-
@mikepalomino this is typical funneling of money up to governments and corporations instead of local programs.
.
Also CAP & TRADE is what there true golden lies. This will allow for corrupt governments and official to take money for Carbon Negative programs that never existed; opening the door for millions of dollars in scams.
.
Banking and stock fraud was bad ... this will be worse.
.
All of this when the enemy are chemicals that kill life; the earth can deal with CO2; 4.5 billion yrs so far.
-
@mikepalomino there is a ton of new evidence pointing to the fact that the "greenhouse effect" by carbon, methanes, etc. accounts for 0.2 - 0.3 % of the heat retained by earth. The other 99.7 - 99.8 % of the retained heat are due to other factors.
.
CO2 and the actual heat retained by earth is NOT strongly correlated. You can see this by looking at a temperature graph vs. CO2 graph for the last 110 years of fairly good empirical data; and it doesn't match.
-
@mikepalomino almost; there are differences in opinion on what is called toxic.
.
I believe in finding clean alternative sources, but the alarmist attitude and taxing of carbon is the mis-direction of corporation heavily invested in this business
.
They chose carbon because they can now charge almost every business a tax.
.
The true enemy of life are the toxic chemicals mention in this video. These chemical shred building block of carbon based life and DNA.
.
CO2 is food for plants and algae.
-
Air armageddon but you don't hear me though.Thanks for sharing.
-
Toxic in nature and toxic in proportion are two different things.
Would you agree, if some were to throw that "cycle of life" as you call it out of balance wouldn't the unbalanced compound become "toxic" to the cycle?
So if something were to impede the uptake of excess carbon in the atmosphere - would you agree, hypothetically at least - that some effect would occur?
And if you disagree, explain why.
-
more money to bankers will solve this CO2 problem.. lets dump the grossly obsolete 120 year old internal combustion contraption instead for its dozens of very old and clean replacements.....parasitism will not hear of it!
SUPPORT REAL NEWS
aerobique 1 year ago 18
Real news has my support for life
insight1025 1 year ago 14