3 Simple Questions for Evolutionists

"I called them not to witness the creation of the heavens and the earth, nor (even) the creation of their own selves. And I would not have taken those who misguide as helpers"
-Quran meaning (18:51)

"God created the great creatures of the sea and every living and moving thing with which the water teems, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind"
-Genesis (1:21)

Yet they claim knowing more than God about creation huh? Let's test their cleverness then...

-------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------

[Update3] That's after like, 9 months from posting: Well folks, I'm STILL waiting for a darn answer from any of our atheist friends. Two poor souls tried emailing me then quickly 'disappeared' (wish I could post their arguments here). If these guys knew about evolution tenth of what they knew about swearing they would've converted the world. Stay tuned, believers :)

[Update2]: Though I have not done so, I reserve the right to remove any comments which say nothing more than "You're stupid" or "Go read a book". Ok, I'm a stupid guy who read a book and asked these questions. If you don't have anything constructive to say (read: If you can't answer any of the points raised), then shut up instead of confirming even more that atheists are total morons who don't know anything about their dogmatic beliefs.

[Update1]: You guys are STRONGLY encouraged to watch the response. If they can't do better than answering different questions and evading points then it's pretty settled. The following is my response, but don't read it before watching the video so as not to spoil the fun

1. Re the creatures which don't need oxygen or sunlight to live, but instead use heat of sea springs: HOW does this change the argument? Assuming they started life, then they can't help in the "evolution" of oxygen-breathing animals anyway! Same for starving mammoths; doesn't explain why didn't a single type of prey grow too strong to take over the planet. You also ignored the timing factor.

2. You totally avoided the second point (first chromosomes) to begin with. So I don't need to comment on this.

3. The plover birds: I never said they would STARVE without crocodiles & vice-versa (same for Grouper/glass fish). I simply said it's impossible for 2 traits to randomly evolve simultaneously. Did the bird "become brave" first or did the croc become "nice" first? Must happen together. I don't believe the plover bird is a myth (I can provide refs like yours but who cares), you ignored all the ants example which contain the main argument. And there are more cooperation examples of course.

You ignored everything I said after the 3 questions too. How surprising.

PS. If you haven't met people who use "evolve" & "develop" about 28 times per sentence, then you haven't read some pro-evolution websites like New Scientist. And if you think the Bible could be compatible with evolution, read Genesis chapters 1 & 2.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Evolution
• Atheism
• Darwin
• Darwinism
• Dawkins
• Atheist
• Moron
• Evolutionist
• Fossils
• Fraud
• Proof
• Evidence
• Creationism
• vs
• Creationist
• Harun
• Yahya
• Religion
• Faith
• Bible
• Quran
• Islam
• Christianity
• IslamoPhilic

[KayBeeEee1983]

This video is ignorant even by creationist standards.

[kram83au]

not worthy of comment. thumbed down

[AndroidCybe]

chromosome answer as i'd imagine: the species that gave birth to the first 46-chromosome creature did not necessarily have to have 46 chromosomes itself. their reproductive cells need to carry those genes. reproductive cells reproduce by copying themselves and multiplying. its likely there were many 46 chromosome offspring coming from the same parent.

[notnilccm]

As a primate I am offended that anyone would think that a chimp would evolve into this ignoramus.

[Grass89Eater]

Hard to find the concrete questions but here is my answers.

1: Impossible for herbivores to make all primates extinct even without carnivores.

2: I don't know happens if a person with this fusion mates with an without it. Non of your examples discussed this scenario which you draw conclusion on.

3: Through small changes. Some of the scenarios I could quickly think of some possible ways some not. Proving it to be impossible for them to evolve into that state is a lot harder then you think.

[McCamodrake]

Birds don't have fur



[unforgivn81]

Short version of this video: evolution cannot be true because I don't understand it at all.

[Vodkametalhead]

After devouring quite a number of birds, one crocodile realised how useful they are to clean their teeth. Other crocodiles saw it and copied the pattern. That is how humans learn face expressions, body language, etc.

[Vodkametalhead]

There is actually no such thing as a perfect balance, you're right about that, that is impossible. But you see, there is a single species that is takng over the planet: the human.

It IS possible for creatures with different cromosomes to procreate under certain circumstances. And if the newborn do not have 64 cromosomes, they have the data in their DNA, which makes it possible for their children to have 64 cromosomes.

[cardinalkesky]

Go take a bio 101 class at your local comm. college... evoulution can be explained to you there quite well

[pyrea17]

you sir, are a moron