Kinsey Coverup - Part 1

Kinsey Coverup with Dr. Judith Reisman.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• documentary
• kinsey
• pedophile
• pedophilia
• research
• sex

[VictorLepanto]

@scotpens: No they weren't. He interviewed mostly convicts & college kids. He called prostitutes who cohabitated w/ their pimps, husbands & wives. His work was a complete fraud.

[LyndaP31]

Hahaha nothing like the truth to rile people up. His own book shows he had children molested for his purposes and even recorded the, ahem, results. Showing this is right wing? Well, all you Kinsey supporters, I guess you think having all these pedophiles on the streets are fine with you. congratulations, your hero helped make that happen.

[DemokraticRepublican]

Verdict: some social conservatives will go to any ends to slander scientists when they DON'T LIKE their findings.

The world is a kinky place. Sorry?

[randomaussiegurl1]

cont. but that doesn't mean that Kinsey abused kids. He interviewed people with their consent about their sexual experiences. I'm willing to wager some of those people were sexually abused as kids. He also interviewed pedophiles, but then so do police. Should they all be accused of pedophilia now? And don't get me started on the Catholic clergy! I know cheap shot....

And wth is a pansexual view?? Pansexuals are merely people who's attraction does not care about the various sexual issues we have

[randomaussiegurl1]

Oh for the love of all that's good in this world! Stop with the blatant slanderous accusations already! Don't get me wrong, pedophiles should all die horribly, and while his research isn't my view of "moral" he is correct in saying children are sexual beings At least in the biological sense.Saying they aren't is an insult to child abuse survivors as a big part of the shame they carry is the fact that they "biologically responded." Are they emotionally capable of dealing with stimulation? No.

[songster102]

I firmly believe that Kinsey solicited the assistance of those who were willing to perform sexual acts on children. I do not believe that his knowledge of sexual behavior in children was received exclusively from the second hand, reported accounts provided by King.

At this point the damage that Kinsey has done to this country is irreversible, and what some would call the result of a needed sexual revolution, is actually a risky and skilful catering to the darkest parts of the human psyche.

[valis1949]

Kinsey and his investigators only interviewed people who engaged in a wide range of sexual behavior. They would not turn anyone in to the police because subjects were guaranteed anonymity. A man by the name of "King" is who gave them a record of his sexual contacts with children. King did the timing, and he recorded it. This info was not in the slanted film.

[joelarnda]

@valis1949 The video asks an important question that your trying to dismiss by your comments. How did Kinsey collect data on children- how he used pedophiles with stopwatches to record orgasms even to where a 4 month old has recorded 26 orgasms in a 24 hour period. It was controversial the ethics used and the fact that admitted academic dishonesty was used as an attempt apologetics.

The fair and balanced aproach is called fact checking- Fact are facts and your being dismissive.

[valis1949]

Kinsey was only investigating the sexuality of human beings, and then reporting his findings. Some would prefer to believe that children have no sexual thoughts until they are of legal age, but Kinsey found this not to be the case. Kinsey was recording sexual behavior as it occurred, not as society would wish it to be, Obviously many prefer The Fair And Balanced Approach. This video is blatantly biased!!

[paulslefthand]

@wilma111 Dude..calm down