Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Bad Movie Gang Reviews "Indiana Jones 4"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
7,141
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 2, 2008

The footage in this work (taken from trailers) is allowed under United States Fair Use and section 30 under UK Copyright Law (Fair Dealing)
---------
The Bad Movie Gang debut with a film that's actually... good.


--Okay admittedly we probably should have said next month, not next week.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 22 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (BadMovieGang)

  • Yes, because the opinion of people represents an entire continent. I also wasn't aware the movies had a sexual preference, but I'll be sure to make a note of that.

  • Do the makers of this video not know the difference between practical effects and computer generated effects? They keep saying CGI is great because they used visual effects in Raiders of the Lost Ark.

  • Erm, yeah, we do. CGI wasn't in Raiders of the lost Ark, but it's there by the bucketload in Indy 4. We're saying that Visual Effects was used to massive effect in Raiders, and the use of effects hasn't changed, it's just done using different methods. With Raiders, they used all the effects that were availible at the time. Why can't they do the same thing today?

Top Comments

  • nice review..

    I think the sci-fi elements to the film were there bcz there have always been paranormal claims that led to the belief that the skull was a star-gate, of some sort. (and I'm not talking about that lame show) Also George Lucas has always had an interest in the skulls. Actually this story idea was originally to appear in "The Young Indiana Jones Chronicles".

  • 2:00 MOUSTACHE.

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (57)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Jeez this is an awful review. It mostly consists of the commentators talking about how stupid they think anyone who doesn't like this movie is. They make it seem like either you like this movie or you're an idiot who thinks classic films are perfect and hate everything new.

    Saying "you shouldn't scrutinize a film" is ridiculous. People are trying to explain why they didn't like it. They didn't go in with a pad trying to scribble down problems. They went in and didn't like it and said why.

  • This movie sucked for many reasons, but the one that stands out is "shia fucking laboeuf swinging through the trees like a monkey..." nuff' said

  • Yeah its Film Brain in his young years haha

  • All the George Lucas fault doing mind control on the Steven Speilberg´s head!

  • The reason i didnt like this film was because of the story and charcters.

    And temple of doom is awsome!!

  • You fucking wankers. stop defending this piece of shit. Mud Williams and fucking inter dimensional beings fuck off. It could have been soo much more and that is what peoples is angry about GET IT

    And we dont hate effects. WE HATE CGI EFFECTS dumbass

  • @BadMovieGang dear matthew ur awesome ! and i luv ur bad movie beatdown symbolism!!!omgwtfgenious !!!!!! oh and magicman205 go fuck urself !!!!!!

  • The problem is: If every little thing like crashing a gate with a car is done by CGI it`s becoming ridiculous.

  • One-thing that is weird this called Bad Movie Gang Reviews but the movie that you are review Indiana Jones 4 didn't called a Bad-Movie in any-way but do agreed with your thoughts on how Indian Jones 4 is not a bad-movie.

  • @magicman205 Ironic how most of the cast and crew where american and it had a love story between a man and a woman. And I'm british and I didn't like it either and alot of my friends didn't like it.

View all Comments »
Loading...

0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more