Part 1 DC City Council Marriage Equality Hearings re: Catholic Charities

part 2
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moUhkfbnw2w
part 3
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiLiv6mxZkE
DC Councilmember David Catania's comments and questions to Emmet Flood, partner at Williams and Connolly, LLP (representing Catholic Charities) and then Edward Orzechowski, the CEO and President of Catholic Charities.

From the DC City Council public hearings on Marriage Equality, October 27th.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• marriage
• equality
• washington
• dc
• david catania
• catholic charities
• gay rights

[gtown705]

That CEO's name is Edward Orzechowski (Catholic Charities) and, according to Washingtonian Magazine, he makes over $268,000 a year. Serving the poor?

[wondermachinedc]

Thanks for the information. I've added it to the video annotations.

[wondermachinedc]

Do you have a link btw? I'd like to add that too.

[gaywisdom]

Wow. 268,000 a year? Thanks for that.

[clubindiana4]

As ussual.....your making shit up. What "mandate" are you talking about? Quote the bill that passed "this year".

[lamexicana32]

This lil debate is becoming futile and insignificant... So plz suppress all that! There is nothing further to discuss, we got our points across for all to see/read. (hopefully) folks will understand your ostentatious display... lol

[lamexicana32]

There is no card game, I DON'T CARE!! LOL @ Bruised ego, really? Ha! Neva that boo boo, like I stated in my last response it's all in entertainment. It's obvioius that u can read/understand what I'm gettin at! OH WELP...LOL, it's a informal blog/comments page didn't know there were formalities w/ it?!?

On the realz though is that all u can come back w/ is my grammer/sp!? Clearly there is nothing u have left to say but to discredit me on my format; look who's talkin in a discursive style now!

[cckabab]

You responded to my comment now you want to play a 'I-don't-care" card? Your display of bruised ego is conspicuous for all to revel in and your silence is a blessing.

And your lack of grasp on rudimentary grammar and spelling (i.e. nervious, legitament, etc.) of English language are an indicative of yet another criminally and sloppy educated sycophant of church's doctrines where discursive style of self-flagellation and garbled set of ideas are amply to be observed.

[lamexicana32]

"The hell are you babbling about anyway?"

If you don't get it then you don't get it(it's probably over your head anyways).

"polemic neophyte who does not deserve any further response."

LMAO... It's obvious that your brain and fingertips don't agree, as you continue to respond.  I could care less if you did or didn't, it does me no never mind. You are very entertaining though *wink*

[lamexicana32]

SMH... silly rabbit. U really think it matters to me what u post!? I came & posted a simple observation on what I seen/thought about the vid. I didn't ask for your mindless banter/babble about my opinions... so carry on w/ all that mess!

Oh & trust there is no nervious laughter in my txt "buddy". I unlike you am well aware w/ what's on the table.

Your use of words only shows me that u like to boast just so u can feel like u really made a legitament argument w/ me *eyes rollin'* puhlleeezze!

[cckabab]

That very decision speaks volume with regard to their moral bankruptcy.

"He pays into taxes w/ his salary..."

Which has been attained from the tax payers. Equally, the POTUS is also a generous citizen because he is paying into taxes. The hell are you babbling about anyway?

"this year will be a much bigger contribution..."

The Bush tax law would not end until 2011. Once again, your uninformed prattling brands you a polemic neophyte who does not deserve any further response. Take a hike.

[cckabab]

It does matter because the majority of his salary is being set aside from a pool of fund that comes from the tax payers. Yet he does not have a decency to obey a possible democratically voted law especially when the designated fund is used to feed unfortunates in our society.

For these people, having a remote possibility to provide a "health care" for partner of a homosexual employee (read: very very few are recruited by their congregation) trumps feeding countless of starving individuals.