Proving the Existence of the Necessarily Existent One *4/4*

I am not thankworthy,
Thank you 4 Watching.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Fallacy
• Myth
• Atheism
• Evolution
• God
• Buddhism
• Hinduism
• Creator
• Space
• Universe
• BigBang
• Creation
• Coincidence
• Error
• Perfect

[ThomasRW2]

many things right, some things wrong whether you know it or not or whether you can reason it or not, im sure if you could have you would have but right now . however yeah, you've actually slightly altered some genius' view on another piece of rock in the world. but even i see where you have gone wrong here, pay me $1000 and i'll tell ya :D

oh and by the by, gj on whatever you want to call the visual aspect of this.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

ok,i have just sent you 1000 dollars

it can reach your door at any second

haha

plus it will come on its own and sweep in through under your door

so keep your dog far from it :D

[Gwisss]

Philosophy does not discover truths, it makes logical assumptions that are often wrong. This is a video based on philosophical logic that makes assumptions using an empty hand of evidence, and then make a conclusion based on this empty hand.

"Just because we can't get info by physical methods"

This quote alone demonstrates the WEAKNESS of it's claim and conclusion.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

yep,whats wrong,mr.?

if you cant reach something through physical ways,does it show you that,the thing does not exist?

i used it against the guy who found that idea enough to disbelieve in the Creator

so,whats weak

[religiousvom1t]

Occam's Razor

[Gwisss]

What you just stated was incomprehensible. Maybe clean it up and try to be clear about what you are saying.

The scientific method is our only and our best method for understanding the truths of the Universe. Any other method is fallacious and corrupt.

[rodawin]

Since I was born in Quebec, Canada ... I mainly read the Bible, more precisely the nwe testament ... But I aslo looked at many ''so called proof of whatever gods the believer said was real'' and never found anything else than hope, faith, supposition and word game straw men argument, or false mathematic proof.

All believers are quite sure their god is the right one, and everyone else go to hell ...

The argument of fear

[ScientiaVeritasEtLux]

"if a few amino acids in a dishonest test,why not thousands of them on its own getting together perfectly"

Nearly all of the 20 amino acids plus the bases of nucleic acids came together spontaneously during the Miller-Urey experiment. I don't think that is was dishonest. But maybe I'm forgetting a particular detail of the experiment.

Nobody is claiming that thousands of amino acids initially came together spontaneously in a perfect manner.

[ScientiaVeritasEtLux]

"cellular machines...,have you heard them?"

Yes, I plan on majoring in structural biology/biophysics, which deals with macromolecular structure and function.

"they are way more complex than the palace in the example"

You're right. I totally agree that they can be incredibly complex. However, my whole qualm with this palace example is that it is not affected by natural selection, whereas macromolecules are. That was why I had felt that the analogy was weak.

[HighFlyingDutchman]

2-and creating life from dead and adding the information in your genes to it and making it work is an imagination which theory of evolution can NEVER explain

it only points to the variation,adaptations,speciati­ons and claims that "why not the same from a bacteria to human"

"if a few amino acids in a dishonest test,why not thousands of them on its own getting together perfectly"

[HighFlyingDutchman]

well,sorry sir for wasting your priceless time which will end after a "few" blinks of an eye

[HighFlyingDutchman]

1-cellular machines...,have you heard them?

they are way more complex than the palace in the example and they are unseen with the naked eye while the palace is seen from miles and the cellular machines keep working alive while the palace only stands there more dead than a death