Is WWE Better Than TNA

No description available.

Category:

Sports

Tags:

• Is
• WWE
• Better
• Than
• TNA

[MrDivalover1]

@hanmerboys tna has samoa joe, abyss, aj styles, daniels, guns, beermoney, genme, better tag team divison better wrestlers and better women's divison.

[hanmerboys]

@geoffreytkd2 dude most ofthe wrestlers you said are old as hell and p.s sting quit TNA but most of them will retire soon oj stylers is TNA's only young watchable wrestler

[geoffreytkd2]

@hanmerboys

dude universal studios wouldnt put it for sale. what about sting kurt angle jeff jarrett samoa joe jame storm kazarian etc. they have so many interseting wrestlers that they can not use them over and over again unlike wwe where they use the same wrestlers again and again. oh yah sheamus isnt that interesting hes just a irish booker t(the king thing) evan bourne will never win a world title and nexus guys have no personality. im a fan of wwe but i like the hardcore im done with you.

[hanmerboys]

@geoffreytkd2 dude by the time TNA is enywhere near WWE vince will just buy them out end ofstory WWE has been on top to long to be taken down by a retirment home known as TNA and dude WWE has twice the better wrestlers than TNA like r truth (you msy know him as ron killings) even borne shemus wade barret justin garbriel and more all TNA has is aj styles

[geoffreytkd2]

@geoffreytkd2

sorry about the second comment couldnt find the first comment posted but i mean it

[geoffreytkd2]

@hanmerboys

dude you know nothing about tna and everything you said about TNA is wrong. i agree wwe has the money. but tna has the entertainment(NOT PG STUFF). TNA has a future so im not argueing money and TNA has money. iv been to a TNA pay per view. TNA has better wrestlers WWE cant hold on to john cena, Randy orton, Edge, and the undertaker forever. when you reply tell me why you think WWE has better wrestlers and watch you. i got a response and dont use triple h or undertaker there ending.

[geoffreytkd2]

@hanmerboys

iv been to a tna pay per view they are alot of money just like wwe and wwe was like tna when they were in the 1950s but here tna is ahead of wwe. tna has better wrestlers and they bring in money and are pretty sucsessful. they also do alot of live shows worldwide. . you dont know anything about TNA so shut up you cant argue. i aree WWE is on top with money now but tna has the better wrestling and they have a future. i like tna because they wrestler phenominal. WWE is to PG for me

[hanmerboys]

@geoffreytkd2 lol what are you smoking TNA is no where near catching up to WWE they still let ppl watch for FREE something no desent company has ever done and then they compet in that shit hole of a room in universal studios TNA is a joke compaired to WWE and they are no where near catching up to WWE

[geoffreytkd2]

@hanmerboys

do you not understand TNA is already catching up to WWE so their not dominating more years when TNA is a bigger company not just a 9 year company they willbe on top because theyre already catching up so when theyre 59 years or even near 25 they could be on top look at ratings WWE is had a long time in buisness to get ahead and TNA are just getting started and their at WWE standereds already.not money, story lines thats what they have. TNA isnt on top yet but they will

[hanmerboys]

@geoffreytkd2 ya wwe is a 59 year buisnesse and what are you smoking TNS is nowhere near WWE and they never will be WWE just dominates pro wrestling

wwe=ppv,rating,fnbaseand future