David Horowitz on Hannity & Colmes

Colmes is such a lying douche Horowitz just explains the law and just explains stolen tax dollars are being used for outright political indoctrination purposes and asshole asshat colmes fascistically denies the real fact of the matter and diverts attaention away from "mandatory" classes which some of them are no doubt and biotches about it to ignore the fact there are no conservative classes only leftist political hack "classes" run by a leftist depoartment with no balance etc.

If you like David Horowitz, then you might like his book "Radical Son". I found it riveting.

It's so hilarious that liberals (AKA useful idiots, who we'd hope would not support socialism) turn on Horowitz. He's just arguing for neutrality, bu since that requires the introduction of some counter-balancing, more "conservative" viewpoints, people go rabid. Horowitz committed the biggest crime possible in the leftist world: he defected!

They are not assumtions--they are not even rhetorical questions--I am being serious--Where were you in lit class or sociology etc. You can say most of the prof did not bend their discussions and LECTURES toward the way left??? I am saying that your experience is apologetic and bogus or you did not have a normal experience. I know one thing--you did not get rhetoric.

Well good for you but that is not the case for most people. It is in the "curriculum" so to speak--also I assume nothing except what you have been shitting from your keypad. I think you are full of shit and out of reality. Magnumduchbag13-I don'tthinkyou went to college at all except for at night where all the professors are adjuncts and don't count in the stats. I am mostly liberal but I can see that the conservative view in college discussions is frowned upon. Where were you??In the parties?

How do I respond to childish responses like this? I could try and rebut your claims, but you provide no hard proof and instead use half your response to insult and make assumptions yet again (how do you know what my school is like and who teaches my classes?). So instead of debating you (the equivalent of thrown grenades when the other guy's throwing stink bombs), I'm just going to ignore these childish comments.

MD13--I am not insulting--those are not rhetorical questions--I am seriously doubting that we understand eachother--first of all indoctrination does not mean you had to join the "cult." Indoctrination just means that every thing was slanted to the left leaving a student with only half an education. I am mostly liberal but I know both sides. I'm not an extremist that harms. YOU do not think under that definition of Indoctrination that colleges are that way?? Come on--you don't see my logic????

Booing at an INVITED intellectual on the lecture circuit and turning backs on the guy is CHILDISH AND RUDE. You, as I can gather, think this is good---BOO THEM YOU SAY. That is a joke. You know that Horowitz is good hearted man who helped so many. He marched and ran many of the civil rights marches in the 60's-70's! FACT. HE is still a great hearted guy--If you disagree with him let him know at the appropriate time---BOOING IS TRASH and peckerwoods behave that way. You seem better than that.

3. 60% of statistics are made up on the spot, 85% of people know that. Heck, let's keep this statistical guessing game going: 75% of people know George W Bush is actually a chimp in people clothes. comeon

THat 85% isprobably wrong too--and that leaves 40% to be dead accurate--and/or not made up. That is a big #---40%. I would not be quick to think everybody is making them up. Thanks for the info. Now if it were 98%--I'd think about believing this--but then again what sociological reject did the HARD science on this study? Can't belive that as 100% either. I guess we should all be postmodern and nililistic and and not be sure of anything. It is NOT OK to BOO people talking--be civil and wait 4 Q&A