9/11 Truth Movement Lies Exposed - Boeing 757

** 9/11 TRUTHTARDS: READ THE BLOG BEFORE COMMENTING! **

I am fully aware that this video does not re-create the exact speeds or flightpath of AA77. It's purely a demonstration of the manouevrability of a Boeing 757 ok so stop leaving your pathetic comments.

'Truther' morons have claimed that a Boeing 757 cannot fly at high speed at low altitude due to 'ground effect' or that the air is too thick or that the aircraft is not agile enough to have performed the sharp turn and descent prior to AA77 striking the Pentagon. If that's so, where are all the currently flying Boeing 757 pilots coming forward agreeing with that? And what about Boeing themselves? Have they come out and said their aircraft couldn't perform the manoeuvres seen on 9/11? Well what do you know? They haven't! To "truthers" that means Boeing are covering up the truth and all the pilots are all paid off! "Truthers" really are the most retarded people on the planet!

The music in this clip is "Battle without honor or humanity" by Tomoyasu Hotei.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• truth
• movement
• boeing
• 757
• flight
• 77

[terrymanning1]

@ChernovFan100 Is it really so difficult to believe that no camera captured the plane?

If the aircraft wasn't AA77 where is it and where are all the passengers that were on it?

[ChernovFan100]

@terrymanning1

I don't give a shit about the 130 eyewitnesses! Yes there was wreckage there but that wreckage could have come from any AA Boeing 757! If AA Flight 77 really did hit the Pentagon why are the US Government so worried about releasing the footage? It's a plane flying into a building! Anyone with a computer that is internet enabled can watch the WTC impacts.

We haven't seen any video of Flight 77's impact - just some photos that show an explosion at the Pentagon

[terrymanning1]

@ChernovFan100 The lack of video evidence is not important. If there was any footage or photos showing the Pentagon impact we would have seen them.

So now please answer what you think about 130 people all seeing a large AA airliner strike the building and nothing else. Are they all liars? Paid off? What about the salvage crews? Liars? What about clear photos of plane wreckage on the Pentagon lawn? How did that get there? Come on give me some evidence to prove your case!

[ChernovFan100]

@terrymanning1

If AA Flight 77 really did hit the Pentagon why did we only get a couple of photos put into a sort of slideshow instead of a real video? Real videos were recorded so shouldn't they be released? Isn't it also strange that none of the aforementioned photographs contain anything that could even possibly resemble a Boeing 757? Explain why the US Govt did not release any photographs containing AA Flight 77 if it actually did hit the Pentagon?

[terrymanning1]

@ChernovFan100 Enough obfuscation ok.

How do you explain 130 eye witnesses seeing a large AA airliner strike the Pentagon if that didn't happen?

No good sending me a personal message asking me to explain the 9/11 conspiracy theories if you won't answer a straightforward question here.

[ChernovFan100]

@terrymanning1

A criminal investigation? Then why didn't they confiscate all of the footage of the WTC impacts?

[terrymanning1]

@ChernovFan100 Probably because it was part of a criminal investigation.

Once again you ignore the testimony of 130 people who all saw an AA airliner strike the Pentagon. What is your response to these people? Are they all liars? Paid off? Did they all imagine what they saw in some kind of brain washing experiment? Why did none see a missile? Why did none of them see anything other than AA77?

Come on you need to give a credible answer to these questions. If you can't you may as well go away.

[ChernovFan100]

@terrymanning1

The representatives of the Federal Bureau of Investigation gave the people who recorded whatever struck the Pentagon doing so not to discuss what they had seen? Why was this?

[terrymanning1]

@ChernovFan100 If employees captured footage on video, have those employees come out and said we saw something other than an AA airliner? The FBI etc would have been gathering evidence that's all. But anyway you don't need video footage to prove AA77 struck the pentagon.

Why do you ignore the 130 eye witnesses who saw the plane? Why do you ignore the findings of air crash investigators and pathology experts who ID's the body parts in the wreckage?

[ChernovFan100]

@terrymanning1

But what about the three locations around the Pentagon whose employees captured the impact of whatever hit the Pentagon on solid video. But representatives of the F.B.I arrived at the three places within minutes of the attack to confiscate the videos. Why did they do this? Explain that...