9/11: PROOF NO MISSILE hit Pentagon, as Proven by News Video from 9/11 (updated -- Flight 77

The Pentagon could not have been hit with a missile, this Local Channel 7 ABC News Video proves. A missile would explode on the outer wall, blowing up the outer E Ring and sending debris showering in all directions. Instead, Fight 77 crashed UNDER the upper floors of the outer E Ring, thorugh a 90 foot wide hole. The upper floors remained intact for 10-20 minutes before the upper floors finally collapsed. A missile would send the upper floors flying UPWARD and OUTWARD. Instead, the upper floors were undisturbed, while Flight 77 passed UNDER the upper floors, and left them intact, though on fire

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• WTC7
• world trade center
• WTC building 7
• terrorism
• al qaeda

[kensmind]

You're wrong. Bunker busters do just that. They are set to explode past the wall. A bunker buster would produce everything we saw on 9/11.

[JonathonMoseley]

@kensmind Bunker busters fall verticlaly (down) by gravity and penetrate into the ground, explode, and make a bloody mess of everything. Bunker busters are not missiles. They do not travel horizontally. And when they explode, they destroy everything in all directions, including at a great depth. They would not leave anythign intact. Any such explosion would destroy the upper floors and send them flying everywhere. No explosive could create 270 feet of destruction inside the building

[ethanvid]

It's all just a cover up. They want us to think it was a missile or a hijacked plane. But it was really an alien attack that almost got a little out of hand.

[BlazeTheJuggalo1]

Could not use the chemicals to make it explode and just use a solid missile..so get your shit straight

[slavenations]

@JonathonMoseley "Missiles -

"The extra speed provided by a rocket motor enables greater penetration of a missile-mounted bunker buster warhead. To reach maximum penetration (Impact depth), the warhead may consist of a high density projectile only. Such a warhead carries more energy than a warhead with chemical explosives (kinetic energy of a projectile at hypervelocity)."

- from the wikipedia page titled "Bunker Buster." now kindly stfu.

[B0rn2ball111]

a plane hit the pentagon really? then how did it create such a perfect circle? and why was their no debree of any plane on the ground? and why did the fbi confiscate survillance videos from both a hotel and gas station that showed exactly what hit the pentagon? they were never released

[sparkyscooter]

not even close evidence.

[snaz27]

JonathonMoseley... I hear you and what you say is logical, about the 270 feet thing... But that hole is not big enough for the jet, besides, a jet would make 3 holes! Wouldn't it? As for the missile, well why couldn't they have laid explosives on the other walls to look like the plane went through, timed to go off when the missile hit? Or maybe it was a new kind of missile?

[irondawson]

No Airplane made that initial small hole just not possible for a big jet, I vote missle