Episode 2: What Darwin Didn't Know

Truth in Science tells us all about cells and introduces Dr Michael Behe and the bacterial flagellum. This is the exact same hypothesis that was demolished during the "Dover Panda" trial.

Category:

Howto & Style

Tags:

• Intelligent
• Design
• Evolution

[interrelation]

Evolution is already old and obsolete. The new theory is Interrelation Theory.

w3 interrelation-theory com

[vbloke]

yes, because magic man dunnit, every interrelated branch of science is wrong.

[gregrutz]

It is complex, I don't understand, do gawd musta dun it.

[stevjen1]

@MidoriFan10 That's right. I just wish Behe would publish that he has been rebutted.

[zezt]

we need to question old long beard Darwins PRESUMPTION theory that life came about from a primeval swamp, and his evolution coming from that premise AND the orthodox religious premise of there being a 'creator' who is separate from 'HIS' creation---There is a start

[grycer]

ID is not science but philosophy. It takes the scientific observations and draws philosophic conclusions from them. The Inference to the Best Explanation- IBE- argument is what ID is based on. What ID claims is that the best explanation for the scientific data is an intelligent designer. Evolution is also a philosophy and to be fair, if this philosophy is claimed to live in science then it only can lead to reason that ID must as well as it’s just as legitimate.

[momomany9]

@cradle4

Why is it that someone who wants to portray himself as intelligent, can't express himself without using vulgarities? It certainly doesn't make you more credible, but rather, seems to negate any point you tried to make. Really not necessary.

[lance9772]

no proof=no GOD?.we are not even close to knowin everythin,sooo perhaps GOD lives in an area,we know nothin about.life can be sooo deceivin,sometimes we just cant see,what we are believin

[blackcatz11]

God and religion does not exist within any area science that we have created and it never has. religion is about and based within , love ,faith , sometimes fear? it exists within the science or "art" of human emotion, and unless we are the perfect creation that god says we are, spiritually and "emotionally"............ gods credibility is going to start falling.

[bassline20]

@CobinRain yes and im going to belive the laws of nature just hapen to write themselves

[bassline20]

@CobinRain yes and im going tpo belive the laws of nature just hapen to write themselves

[TheWad1959]

@hyugs1 mmmmmmm....then riddle me this, why doesn't ANY OF THE EVIDENCE LEAD TO A GOD? Is god messing with us?...did he place all those fossils in those different strata...just to mess with u? Did he create human chromosome 2 to just fool us??

[MidoriFan10]

@cradle4 Behe is an entirely legitimate scientist. He is wrong about his arguments for irreducible complexity, but he has published peer-reviewed work in his field and does have a legitimate degree. To say that a man with a legitimate Ph.D in biochemistry doesn't know the first thing about science is rather arrogant, especially if you can't claim better credentials.

Again, he's wrong about irreducible complexity, but he's not a moron.