The Second Law of Thermodynamics - Proof of God!

Journal Censors 'Second Law' Paper Refuting Evolution
http://www.icr.org/article/6209/

MORE: The Genesis Record by Henry Morris - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AyT0QrS3Hu4

Quotes by Evolutionary Scientists Against Evolution - http://www.warneveryone.com/evolution_scientists_quotes.htm

Live broadcasting with instant message - http://www.justin.tv/warneveryone Plesiosaur Discovered - http://www.warneveryone.com/dino_found.htm....

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• crxxxev
• Henry-Morris
• Julian-Huxtley
• creation
• evolution
• Dinosaur
• whales
• stars
• moon
• earth
• comets

[robotmonkey73]

The second law of thermodynamics only applies to closed systems. The earth is not a closed system. It receives sunlight, meteorites, radiation, etc. etc.

Next please.

[batistaker123]

Assholes that don't understand science......



[uru39]

If you take the low entropy of the planet Earth and compare it to the incomprehensible increases of entropy throughout the universe (the trillions of living and dying suns) then the decrease in entropy here has little to no effect on the over all increase in entropy of the universe (universe as a closed system). The entropy of the universe is always increasing no matter how much life is created.

[gregrutz]

''Evolutionists say creationists don't understand the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics''

Which is true.

The second law applies to a system.  Whatever you define as the system you want to study. IF a person is the system then life would NOT be possible, he would die, the person needs energy from outside the system to live. So the system of life on earth must be defined to include the sun for life and evolution to happen. Include the universe if you want, the whole thing IS running down.

[gregrutz]

So why did God make everything so it will all run down and someday all be cold and dead?

[012333280]

is god a creation of man or a creator of man. come up with a good answer to that one, you let me know.

[Andromedonian]

@killingspeerx Well one part of your comment is right.

[Andromedonian]

@AugmentedMinor God has yet to be proven. Go to google and search for an article PROVING the existence of god. The bible does not count. I do not consider a book that is filled with contradictions left and right and that has been re-interpreted and re-formatted and translated into over 2000 languages for over 2000 years from unverifiable authors originating in the bronze age to be a reliable source.

And on a side note, evidence and mathematics do point towards black holes.

[killingspeerx]

i dont understand a thing but 1 thing for sure and it is that GOD do Exisit or else how did we get to this life

[scienceisknolwedge]

but guys let's remember one thing:

Proving evolution wrong is not a proof that god(s) exist.

Science, differs from religion by admitting it's mistakes and considering the possibility of being wrong. That's why we have a method and we debate.

Also explain an interesting phenomenon; when people stopped being persecuted and murdered by religious institutions (states, churches, etc), science began to grow enormously.

[scienceisknolwedge]

Using science to prove god. If you accept rational arguments to prove god you must accept them to deny it.

if the second law prove his existence, Lavoisier law proves that Jesus never turned water in wine, since he would have to create atoms. But if you argue it was an open system, you also have to agree with the robotmonkey73 argument.

"If rational arguments worked with religious people, there would be no religious people" Dr House