photographic proof of the moon landings
Uploader Comments (markandrach)
Video Responses
All Comments (11)
-
However I'm not completely bought, I guess a clear image of the actual sites would finalise things for me.
-
I take a lot of what I said back lol just found a site that explains quite a few of these ;D
-
While I do acknowledge and refuse to dismiss the potential plausibility of Kaguya's 3d visualization of the surface... it's just that, a visualization open to editing to whatever one may want to change it to and if you tell me no its the truth then give me proof that America had no influence or opportunity to alter that 3D visualization to suit their purposes?
-
And I ask for explanations on a scientific level, as far as explaining the flag, explaining the different light sources, the high quality images taken INSIDE shadows, the lack of stars, the lack of a landing crater, identical sites, the deaths of 15% of NASA astronauts at the time, how the astronauts survived radiation at levels higher than 3 mile island without a scratch among others... NASA fail to give scientific answers, refuse to comment or dismiss sceptics as crazy... hmmm
-
modules! With a satellite as powerful and advanced as they are today (Just look at spy satellites capable of resolving to half a meter at around 35,786km ... Kaguya had an altitude of 100km... ) bringing home new pictures of one of the great prides of America should be something NASA should be keen to do! Once again reminding its country of the good investment in human development they made and what a great country america is... but no. care to explain that?
-
It's sad to hear that you think so, I consider myself more someone who looks at concrete undeniable evidence done by independent sources and seeing how JAXA is under NASA's wing I wouldn't classify that as an independent source... however all critics are asking for are scientific explanations behind some of the phenomena observed on the apollo missions and with current technology, an ACTUAL image of the landing sites that show a flag, clearly show the footprints and show the lunar
-
Yep.
To think that NASA would give a crap about a Moon hoaxhead or a conspiracy YT video? Delusions of grandeur comes to mind. So does Oedipal Narcissism.
I sometimes ask a hoaxhead this: The Japanese KAGUYA mission (2008) made 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. These and an actual Apollo 15 photograph were compared. Although some of the detail is missing (as the individual rocks are below the 10 meter resolving power of the orbiting camera), the scenes are identical.
Pictures of the moon made in 1971 and 2008 are IDENTICAL. Guess why?
Yes, we did land on the Moon. Only self absorbed fools think they can outsmart astronomers acknowledging.
Rob260259 2 months ago
@Rob260259 yeah ive seen them rob,totally identical.amazing how they ignore that.
it makes me laugh when they say why dont they go back to prove it.
i tell them why should they go back just to shut up a very small minority of people who will say thats fake also.
they have the same mentality of a religous fundamentalist.
markandrach 2 months ago
The world makes so much more sense when you are capable of evaluating the worth of evidence. Yes, these LRO photos do show that we were there.
I made a video comparing the LRO photos and descent film from Apollo 11. The tracks that you show match the EVA photos and ascent film from Apollo 17, too, (as well as could be expected.)
Astrobrant2 2 months ago 2
@Astrobrant2 thanks,i really find it hard to believe some people can still deny they went when the evidence is undeniable.
i think it goes deeper than the moon landing,its more of an anti government feeling from them.
at least we can watch the videos for what they really are.the greatest moment in mans history.leaving the planet weve spent millions of years on
markandrach 2 months ago