Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

photographic proof of the moon landings

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
213 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Dec 3, 2011

here are a few photos that have been taken of the landing sites to the apollo missions.footpaths and craft are visable

Category:

Pets & Animals

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 2 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (markandrach)

  • I sometimes ask a hoaxhead this: The Japanese KAGUYA mission (2008) made 3D visualizations of the lunar surface. These and an actual Apollo 15 photograph were compared. Although some of the detail is missing (as the individual rocks are below the 10 meter resolving power of the orbiting camera), the scenes are identical.

    Pictures of the moon made in 1971 and 2008 are IDENTICAL. Guess why?

    Yes, we did land on the Moon. Only self absorbed fools think they can outsmart astronomers acknowledging.

  • @Rob260259 yeah ive seen them rob,totally identical.amazing how they ignore that.

    it makes me laugh when they say why dont they go back to prove it.

    i tell them why should they go back just to shut up a very small minority of people who will say thats fake also.

    they have the same mentality of a religous fundamentalist.

  • The world makes so much more sense when you are capable of evaluating the worth of evidence. Yes, these LRO photos do show that we were there.

    I made a video comparing the LRO photos and descent film from Apollo 11. The tracks that you show match the EVA photos and ascent film from Apollo 17, too, (as well as could be expected.)

  • @Astrobrant2 thanks,i really find it hard to believe some people can still deny they went when the evidence is undeniable.

    i think it goes deeper than the moon landing,its more of an anti government feeling from them.

    at least we can watch the videos for what they really are.the greatest moment in mans history.leaving the planet weve spent millions of years on

Video Responses

see all

All Comments (11)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @markandrach

    However I'm not completely bought, I guess a clear image of the actual sites would finalise things for me.

  • @markandrach

    I take a lot of what I said back lol just found a site that explains quite a few of these  ;D

  • @markandrach

    While I do acknowledge and refuse to dismiss the potential plausibility of Kaguya's 3d visualization of the surface... it's just that, a visualization open to editing to whatever one may want to change it to and if you tell me no its the truth then give me proof that America had no influence or opportunity to alter that 3D visualization to suit their purposes?

  • @markandrach

    And I ask for explanations on a scientific level, as far as explaining the flag, explaining the different light sources, the high quality images taken INSIDE shadows, the lack of stars, the lack of a landing crater, identical sites, the deaths of 15% of NASA astronauts at the time, how the astronauts survived radiation at levels higher than 3 mile island without a scratch among others... NASA fail to give scientific answers, refuse to comment or dismiss sceptics as crazy... hmmm

  • @markandrach

    modules! With a satellite as powerful and advanced as they are today (Just look at spy satellites capable of resolving to half a meter at around 35,786km ... Kaguya had an altitude of 100km... ) bringing home new pictures of one of the great prides of America should be something NASA should be keen to do! Once again reminding its country of the good investment in human development they made and what a great country america is... but no. care to explain that?

  • @markandrach

    It's sad to hear that you think so, I consider myself more someone who looks at concrete undeniable evidence done by independent sources and seeing how JAXA is under NASA's wing I wouldn't classify that as an independent source... however all critics are asking for are scientific explanations behind some of the phenomena observed on the apollo missions and with current technology, an ACTUAL image of the landing sites that show a flag, clearly show the footprints and show the lunar

  • @markandrach

    Yep.

    To think that NASA would give a crap about a Moon hoaxhead or a conspiracy YT video? Delusions of grandeur comes to mind. So does Oedipal Narcissism.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more