Dragon Age II (PC, PS3, Xbox 360)

Read the full review: http://www.gamespot.com/6301579

It isn't the wonder its predecessor was, but Dragon Age II is still a quality role-playing game that focuses on the element of choice to great effect.

Category:

• Gaming

Tags:

• dragon
• age
• ii
• da2
• da
• bioware
• rpg
• mass
• effect
• ea
• video
• game
• gaming
• gameplay
• review
• juejo
• juegos
• jojos
• xbox
• 360
• ps3
• playstation
• pc
• gamespot
• gamespot.com

[Usernamesarebunk420]

wow way to lose the weight kevin. Props

[rsmaster16]

This isn't a shitty game guys, it's just disappointing if you played DA:O I bet if it came out under a different title it would be a good game. It just should't be a DA game, but I enjoyed playing it.

[draxx85]

Having just finished the game I would say that I would mostly agree with the review except they missed out some serious flaws in the game. This game recycles enviorments and levels more then anything I have ever played. It got so bad that the only reason I continued playing was becaue the story was so good. Tedious levels constantly repeated ruined the game. It was rediculous! But I did enjoy the game overall

[TrancoTechnizer]

at first I was all against this game, didnt liked the ew interface, I hated the fact that you controll a premade character and that the campaign is much shorter than in Origins. But then I was given a chance to play it, and Wow. The game is at least the same quality as the first one

[Dominos1011]

Its not a bad game at all, just that origins is SO much beter

[getitherereloaded]

this is FAKE...I think he has been paid to say its awesome

[kiki119302]

i hav ps3

[kiki119302]

what are the top 5 rpgs.i like skyrim and might get dragon age 3 when/if it comes soon.is it true custom character in 1 but no 2? might be multiplayer.anyway they are getting ideas from skyrim so i may like it.should i buy #3 or not l.and can i get a brief explanation on the the dragon age games n if i will miss out on anything since i didn't play 1 or 2

[patatahooligan]

@sirlag01 That's exactly what's he saying. It's not the underlying game's fault, it's the name it bears that disappointed the fans. DA:O was awesome whereas DA II was just good and everybody hated on it like it was one of the worst games to ever come out.

[sirlag01]

@rsmaster16 That's just absolutely ridiculous. Changing the title, well how does that change the underlying game?

[DominoChild]

If the third one includes multiplayer, like it is rumored to be, then I might wait until that game comes out to decide on which one of the three is worth my money.

[kingofthings7929]

Thanks muayrannu