Carly Fiorina & The Latino Community w/ Axel Caballero

http://www.facebook.com/bravenewfoundation

http://www.youtube.com/user/bravenewfoundation

http://twitter.com/axelwoolfolk

http://metaforapolitica.com/

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• axel
• caballero
• brave
• new
• foundation
• news
• politics
• young
• turks
• cenk
• uygur
• tyt
• interview
• carly
• fiornia
• friend
• latino
• community
• california
• 2010
• midterm
• elections
• voters
• attack
• ad
• fox
• federal
• government
• secure
• border
• security
• mexico
• mexicans
• illegal
• immigrants
• undocumented
• workers
• arizona
• law
• racial
• profiling
• racist
• amnesty
• pathway
• citizenship
• comprehensive
• conservative
• right
• wing
• enforcement
• cops
• officers
• shakira
• sb1070
• drug
• cartels
• sarah
• palin
• deportation
• fear
• mongering

[smartin807]

I'm in Silicon Valley, and have lots of friends that work for HP. NONE OF THEM HAVE ANY LOVE FOR Carly Fiorina! The Packard family (the 'P' in HP) actually HATED her and asked for her resignation. My friends say She screwed up HP and took a long time to fix after She left. I was stunned that after the mess She made at HP that She had the BALLS to run for office. Is that the way it works now? Really screw up a company and after you get kicked out, you're now qualified for a government office?

[crackerz99]

dude, i thought illegals were bankrupting this country by working for Hewlett packard and then taking 21 million dollar severance checks? thats why were in this recession. no? it was Carly Fiorina? damn, a white person, i gota find another way to hate Latinos.

[lordcheetah]

@1674090 No your example is a false equivocation. Two boxers do not kill each other, and two boxers must agree to fight. Even dualing, which is illegal where the dualers may kill each other, they must agree to fight. In war, there doesn't need to be an agreement to fight. And just because it's tradition to steal the loser's land, doesn't make it right.

[1674090]

@lordcheetah that's a false equivocation. Two men who fight under the confines of a sport, ie. Boxing or Hockey or UFC, do have the right to beat the shit out of each other because they enter into an arena and decide to interact in that way, the same goes for two countries who choose to settle disputes with armed conflict. That is how foreign relations has been for millennia.

[crackerz99]

@grim632 it was sarcasm...

[grim632]

@crackerz99 racist dick

[lordcheetah]

@1674090 You can't hold someone at gunpoint just because the other person has a gun too? So it's ok to beat the shit out of someone and take their stuff as long as their equally armed?

[1674090]

@lordcheetah saying by gunpoint would lead one to believe that only one party had the gun, it is a misleading statement. You are implying that only the US had guns and we all know that this is not the case, so get over yourself and come back with a rational and relevant equivalent argument.

[lordcheetah]

@1674090 And that's not theft at gunpoint how exactly?

[1674090]

@psynema Crockett, was fighting for Texas, and disagreed with the slavery, by the Alamo he was too far-gone. It was also about Santa Ana destroying the constitution and consolidating power and not allowing the votes as he promised.

[1674090]

@lordcheetah right, because when two countries go to war, with each other and one wins on the battle field, the winner doesn't decide the spoils, ok.

[Nixin1]

I love how white liberals think they speak for the latino/black/muslim community...you and daily kos make me freakin sick!!! from 1 rightwing conservative latino.....