Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Proof of God?

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
799 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jan 2, 2010

I'm more just curious as to what proof would be sufficient to acknowledge the idea that there could be an existence outside of the physical universe. Reply to. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U8E0pRA9qxw

Category:

Education

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 18 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (tristenmc)

  • When one puts couple words together It doesn't imply that it is logic. You can ramble on all you want However one thing you failed to proof in the video was why atheist are materialist . If you going to imply something please have enough evidence to back it up.

  • @tharjini22

    My video was very clear that I had no intention of proving anything since I did not have a dog in the fight.

  • Not sure where you expect to get by using over-generalizations, fallacy logic arguments... Perhaps you prefer that your perceptions are framed "in another physical world".

  • @tubeexcellence

    It's an analogy used to ask a question. What proof would we expect to see from a creator?

  • @tristenmc I have no answer since: 1) I have no need to offer or answer fallacy logic based questions, 2) I am not the "creator" you refer to, and 3) I do not expect or demand proof from the "creator" you refer to.

  • @tubeexcellence

    Then there was no need to come here.

Video Responses

This video is a response to The "Invisible" God
see all

All Comments (124)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @joethemoproductions

    I will leave you with this quote to ponder:

    "Information is information, not matter or energy. No materialism which does not admit this can survive at the present day." Norbert Weiner, MIT Mathematician and father of cybernetics

  • @joethemoproductions

    Since you clearly cannot refute 50 plus years of biologists and scientists saying that cells utilize coded information, we have come to an end to our conversation. I would suggest you look more closely into biology or mathematical theory of communication for references.

  • @tristenmc

    On a cold day, you perceive the cold and react to it in two ways. Your conscious mind reacts and thinks, "I need a jacket." Your metabolism reacts automatically to the change in temperature and shivers. Your mind is analyzing information, the body reacts to automatically "information."

    That is the difference you're ignoring.

    Still waiting for a substance that is independent of matter.

    Learning how to use terms, really good idea.

  • @joethemoproductions

    4. DNA transcription is an encoding / decoding mechanism isomorphic with Claude Shannon's 1948 Mathematical Theory of Communication model. The sequence of base pairs is encoded into messenger RNA which is decoded into proteins.

    

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more