CNBC Vs. Climategate truth (Truth Wins!)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
5,602
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
  • likes, 3 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Uploader Comments (busbee85)

  • We are gonna have this legislation forced upon us because the infrastructure is already built and staffed for this carbon dioxide underground storage/reuse for oil recovery. Check into it.

  • @Renathra You may be right. But at the end of the day its about population reduction. If you can control and legislate carbon dioxide, They will be able to decide who lives or dies.

Top Comments

  • Nice unbiased interviewing there from the host (rolleseyes)

  • RAMPANT GAY VAMPIRE JOURNALIST

see all

All Comments (76)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Simon is the kind of idiot that knows nothing about this subject and makes lone want to just slap him, if the opportunity was ever presented, because that would be the only way to wake him up.

  • Inhofe has now got all the investigation he called for. There were three inquiries in the UK and another in the US. Their findings are now all in, and didn't fit Inhofe's conspiracy theories. So Inhofe drew up a list of 17 leading scientists and tried to get the U.S. Justice Department to prosecute them!

    Is Inhofe sponsored by oil and gas? You betcha.

  • @YianniAgisilaou hahaha yeah fox is the only one not seen as REAL news lmao......whos REAL now?

  • I was fooled once, now I know the truth. We are being hoodwinked! Al Gore you NEW WORLD ORDER wanker. Made enough money yet out of our fears!

  • Hahahahaha I love it how Simon was nearly squealing and throwing a fit about the fact that everything he said was blown out of the water and how he couldnt throw an even penny value statement back at the Senator!

  • And this is why CNBC doesn't like to have guests with opposing views.

    Kudlow doesn't seem to understand how creating a scientific thoery works. You can't just pick and choose which findings to accecpt and ignore. If you aren't taking all science into account you are munipulating and corrupting the results. A question with that obvious of an answer is only asked by someone who doesn't understand. He asked it twice.

    I also like the way the Senator shot down that "witch hunt" phrase.

  • @busbee85 Amen brother!

  • @USAneedsaChange

    It's a scam

  • the news anchorwomen is on crack

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more