Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

04 Debunking space-time

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
20,784
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Jun 23, 2008

http://www.lulu.com/content/7436620

http://www.amazon.com/Why-God-Doesnt-Exist-ebook/dp/B002IPHCME

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/WGDE.html

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/03GR/01Emp/00SumEmp.html


http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/01Math/05Dim/04Z3Proof.html

Relativists claim that the Universe is four-dimensional. They justify this with the notion of the word 'dimension' of Mathematics: "the number of coordinates."

Here we show that this definition cannot be used consistently. It leads to the ridiculous conclusions that routinely emanate from the world of Mathematical Physics.

The scientific version of the word dimension is the popular notion of length, width, and height. Once we apply this definition on General Relativity's space-time, the ridiculous notion that we live within a 4-D sphere that the mathematicians have propounded for 100 years collapses without hope.

http://www.youstupidrelativist.com

  • likes, 119 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (4,314)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "video on E shell and rope touch"

    Video 29. If all goes well, in a couple of weeks...

  • Yeah, society has been brainwashed to believe in athourity without thinking rationally and gets concepts and objects confused with one another. Btw, are you still going to post that video on E shell and rope touch?

  • He doesn´t have a clue! He´s studying some BS in college. Xero´s already being molded on the Math Assembly Line.

  • "...dynamic dimensions..."

    Bill, just give up on this idiot.

  • 2. "incorporate... dimensions of the house in the form of distances"

    What does distance have to do with dimension?

    .

    "the world needs ditch diggers too"

    I'm glad that gives you hope, Xero, because you certainly won't cut it in Science.

  • 1. "coordinate = vector = dimensions"

    There's no diff b/w a dimension, a coordinate and a vector?

    .

    "vectors are not always dynamic dimensions are not always static, and coordinates..."

    Make up your mind, Xero! Either there's no diff or there is. It would help if you define each of these terms so that you don't confuse them.

  • coordinate = vector = dimensions

    You are using different definitions to confuse the watcher. First you invoke the mathematical definition.. then you invoke the colloquial definition in an attempt to make the establishment seem like it is acting surreptitiously... you are just stupid and can't follow.. the world needs ditch diggers too

  • he's not being inconsistent... the definitions are isomorphic... get it through your thick skull

  • you obviously dont know what a magnitude is as defined by mathematics if you think that magnitude and direction are one in the same

View all Comments »
Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more