Video Rebuttal To "Questioning Religion"

Some very common Questions where asked by the orginal video, these are not new questions. This video is a direct rebuttal for each question asked. No Slander, Derogatory language was used, just plain simple mannered rational and logical answers.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Rebuttal
• response
• answering
• questioning
• religion
• debate
• video
• classical
• theology
• creator

[Anhar001]

No we are all salves to a Creator, not a book,

Even you are a slave to a Creator whether you like it not, don't believe me? Then try going breaking the laws of physics, you can't because those laws had to be imposed by someone. A law needs a lawmaker because laws don't make themselves.

Anyway believe want you want to believe, whatever makes you happy, I've tried being patient with you but your ignorance is just too much to for me to waste my time on.

[Anhar001]

Good luck too you too (and I mean that in an honest way NOT a sarcastic way)

I do actually hope that one day you will wake up and actually think for your self and not just be a slave to society and just repeat what other people say.

[Anhar001]

Thus you can not explain how Nature come about by using nature itself (that's could circular reasoning) hence one requires a higher domain above nature to explain nature. Once you move away from the lower spheres of knowledge (science) you move into the higher spheres of knowledge (Theology) and they compliment each other.[Part 9/9]

[Anhar001]

Science is the domain of the natural world, but science DOES have its limits. The limits of science are the observable Nature. IF however you wish to explain Nature itself, it's logically impossible. BECAUSE there is a big difference between explaining Nature and explaining Nature ITSELF.[Part 8/9]

[Anhar001]

Your partially correct, science is logical (using inductive proof) and is based upon the Scientific method (which was invented by Islamic scientists that gave birth to the modern sciences). Science and Religion actually are not in conflict or contradiction (at least not with Islam and science). This is one of the greatest misconceptions.[Part 7/9]

[Anhar001]

Clearly you do not believe in a Creator so logically that rules out Theist, and you claim not to be an Atheist, that logically means you would have to be an Agnostic. As an Agnostics you simply can not argue against OR for a Creator (because that would place you as an Atheist/Theist). So technically that would make you a liar or just plain confused.[Part 6/9]

[nicazeman]

5 stars and note, only intelligent man can understand religion. Thank you for video.

Selam from Bosnia.

[SASMOUNTAINTROOPER]

You are a slave to a book.

A slave to the men who created religion.

I am a slave to myself.

What I say is what I say, I'm not a parrot.

[SASMOUNTAINTROOPER]

Pff, I'm not reading all of that.

Good luck with reaching Heaven.

[Anhar001]

You say you're not an Atheist and that you don't believe in any religion that's totally fine. BUT there is only three types: Theist, Atheist and Agnostic, (ignoring the subgroups of those) you can ONLY be one of those.[Part 5/9]