LouTube Global Warming Hoax
Loading...
Loading...
2,400
Loading...
9:57
The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 6)by FreeProphet19,341 views- 1:06
Another scientist comes out against global warmingby libNOT70,909 views
- 7:30
A Humorous Look At The Global Warming Hoax (Part 1)by ASimpleEquation4,891 views
- 1:08
Global Warming Hoax Admission by the EU Presidentby UKInfoWarrior1,337 views
- 0:57
Global Warming Hoaxby macumba291,780 views
- 1:24
The Climate Hoaxby JonThm4,315 views
- 9:50
The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 1)by FreeProphet110,465 views
- 10:55
Ron Paul HR 1207 Audit the Fed, NWO, Global Warming Hoax (1/2)by PassTheLoot983 views
- 3:36
LouTube - Seattle media biased against Dino Rossiby NorthwestCamera1,393 views
- 2:54
Another Global Warming Hoax exposedby strangenation144,888 views
- 7:43
Smoke and CO2: How to Spin Global Warmingby AmericanNewsProject2,629 views
- 2:02
GLOBAL WARMING HOAX?by Hughsnews64,113 views
- 1:53
Global Warming Ends & Ice Age Begins Antarctica Ice 2000 to 2009by Chris219197042,281 views
- 10:59
Show Update for 8-20-2009 global warming a joke the green movement and cash for clunkersby MidnightRunnerShow168 views
- 9:53
The Man-made Global Warming Hoax (Part 5)by FreeProphet21,838 views
- 9:21
Global Warming Hoaxby macumba29538,258 views
- 5:03
Sen. Inhofe On Global Warming: 'This Thing Is Phony'by climatebrad14,374 views
- 4:47
The Great Global Warming Hoaxby skyrish995,580 views
- 3:03
LouTube Environmental extremists should face murder chargesby NorthwestCamera950 views
- 2:34
LA NIÑA effects on climate change/global warmingby illyounotme2,258 views
I don't believe in god and I have 4 signatures.
sorry god, I don't believe in global warming ether.
PerspectiveEngineer 1 year ago
news flash: 17,000 isnt a large number of people on such a big topic... i wonder how many people would say it is real. this guy and his whole generation shit me with their fear of change. our world will improve a lot when they die off...
the seasonal warmings have never been this early and we're already over all of the identical previous temperatures and carbon persence and climbing,
BMXDANNNY 1 year ago
this raving old man is talking out of his ass definately, every one of his apparent facts can be countered by logic. he backs it up with talk of a petition that 17,000 joined to say that they dont believe its real (aka are uninformed and dont want to risk losing any money),
BMXDANNNY 1 year ago
LOL. The Oregon Institute Petition was a notorious scam showing the denier's dishonesty. It was a push-pull mass mailing without integrity checks, that deceptively impersonated a National Academies of Science mailing. It was so deceptive that the NAS took the unusual step of an official statement saying it had nothing to due with the OIP. Among the "finest minds in climatology and the sciences" that signed it were Michael J. Fox, Robert C. Byrd, John C. Grisham, and one of the Spice Girls.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 2 years ago
This guy is just talking out his ass - he has no clue WTF he's talking about. I paid attention - EVERY factual assertion he made was wrong, with the sole exception that warming trends come and go (LOL - "without damaging the Earth" - as of that were the issue - it's about damaging US). And that's of course a completely irrelevant to the scientific consensus that humans are driving the recent global warming that threatens OUR well being.
VeryEvilPettingZoo 2 years ago
Just google climate in the carboniferous .. Its the first link.
uboat21 2 years ago
Whereas, you don't believe the world is going to explode on the authority of any knowledge you have. You believe it on the authority of *someone* that the media has told you is a scientific expert. Fine. You want to believe the government-paid scientists they put on TV? You do that. I'll believe the non-government paid scientists who have to go to the internet or Fox to be heard. Btw, the ice cores say that CO2 concentration follows temperature, not the other way around.
JustSomeGuy77 3 years ago
It's called listening to scientific authorities. Please. You wouldn't know crap if you "thought for yourself." How do you know smoking causes cancer? Scientific authorities. How do you know next week's weather? Scientific authorities. Who tracks the trends, analyze the ice cores, and test models? Scientific authorities (ie not you). What knowledge you have is negligible compared to that of our scientists. You don't even know the difference between weather and climate. Get yourself a textbook.
yamisamre 3 years ago
Can you find any "reputable" scientific agency that isn't funded by grant money that has a THE-WORLD-WILL-EXPLODE-IN-100-YEARS stance? No? That's what I thought. Think for yourself. You're listening to people telling you what the weather will be like in 100-200 years, when they can't even tell you whether or not it will rain tomorrow. That's called being a sheep, bud.
JustSomeGuy77 3 years ago
makes sense
aGlobalWarmingHOAX 3 years ago