T90 vs abrams

T90 vs abrams

Category:

Autos & Vehicles

Tags:

• tanks
• т
• 90
• абрамс
• танк
• военное
• дело

[RobotN001]

autoloader on video from T-80, not from T-90

[guyholikestuf]

Speak english Communist fuck!

[guyholikestuf]

what?



[1JesseW]

@FieldMarshallRommel I think the T-90 is better, it's cheaper.

[FieldMarshallRommel]

both tanks are a same match, it all comes down to Numbers in battle, who fired first, where the sheel hits, the distance of combat, the training the crew has...so yeah

[tosun97]

Sooooo... Which one is better?

[BitnikGr]

@Buuub08 "The US itself has had 3 DIFFERENT types of steel used as RHA measure at different times."

What they have now is what counts. Its a medium-soft armor steel, just like in Russia. Before they had hardened steel.

RHAe estimations for KE rounds are more accurate than of CE rounds and they vary much less +/- 5%. So, yes... it is just an estimation, but it gives some objective picture.

[BitnikGr]

@Buuub08 "The A3 wasnt made slower, it was made heavier."

There is a term in Exterior Ballistics, which describes optimum max speed for a missile (as any throwing object). Each KE round has it's own optimized max speed and excess of this speed will lead to excessive drag and more rapid loss of speed. Resulting with worse results at max ranges.

[Buuub08]

RHAe doesnt include possible penetrator deformations, efficiency of jet formation and so forth. Such things are simply unpredictable and thus not accounted for in RHAe estimates, instead they use formulas based primarily on density. They are on the level of middle school physics. You shouldnt rely on them or take them as some sort of solid fact. They have been busted on numerous occasions where munitions penetrated far more than they should have according to RHAe estimates.