PART 4 | NIMROD vs Assyrians Magis vs EGYPTIANS & Secret of ETHIOPIC Hebrews | Rasiadonis

PART 4 | NIMROD vs Assyrians Magis vs EGYPTIANS & Secret of ETHIOPIC Hebrews_NEW.mp4 Light - Ras Iadonis Tafari reveals and rebuts counterfeit Jewish and racist misinterpretations of Curse of Ham myth and the demonization of NIMROD, the son of Cush (biblical Ethiopia) .... SUBSCRIBE Today! Give Thanks! Members Log-in: http://lionofjuda.ning.com ETHIOPIAN-HEBREW DIASPORA BLOG: http://EthiopianWorldFederation.ning.com & Order many RARE & INFORMATIVE DVDs http://lojsociety.org/docvideos

BRIEF SYNOPSIS - EDITED BY RAS IADONIS TAFARI
Since the 7th century by European Khazar "Jewish" Rabbinical converts and in the 8th century by later Bedouin desert Arabs, the "son of Cush (the Ethiopian)," Nimrod has traditionally been considered the leader of those who built the Tower of Babel in Shinar, though the Bible never actually states this. Nimrod (Hebrew: נִמְרוֹד, Modern Nimrod Tiberian Nimrōḏ Aramaic: ܢܡܪܘܕ‎ Arabic: نمرود‎) is according to the Book of Genesis, a great-grandson of Noah and the king of Shinar. He is depicted in the Bible as both a man of power in the earth and mighty hunter. He also figures in many legends and folktales outside the Bible. The Holy Bible warns true Christians of these "jewish fables" in the following words from Titus 1:14 "Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth." Such "Jewish fables" called extra-Biblical traditions were used as the racist pretext in associating this once great Cushite named Nimrod with the Tower of Babel and thus led to a darkening or "blackening" in the negative sense of his ancient illustrious reputation. Because of this deception, it is commonly nowadays usually assumed that it was under Nimrod's direction that the building of the Tower of Babel began (this is a white supremacist lie); aside from Flavius Josephus, this is also the view found in the Talmud (Chullin 89a, Pesahim 94b, Erubin 53a, Avodah Zarah 53b), and later midrash such as Genesis Rabba.

Several of these early European (Khazar/Askenazi) Judaic sources also assert that the king Amraphel, who wars with Abraham later in Genesis, is none other than Nimrod himself. However, the two men, Nimrod and Abraham, lived almost 500 years apart. Therefore, Nimrod could not be "Amraphel" and Abraham and Nimrod were not enemies like the Jewish Rabbis assume and make others believe in their tales. Ezekiel 22:9
"In thee (Judaism) are men (Rabbis) that carry tales to shed blood: and in thee they eat upon the mountains: in the midst of thee they commit lewdness."

The Book of Jubilees mentions the name of "Nebrod" (the Greek form of Nimrod) only as being the father of Azurad, the wife of Eber and mother of Peleg (8:7). This account would thus make him an ancestor of Abraham, and hence of all Hebrews.

Judaic mis-interpreters as early as Philo and Yochanan ben Zakai (1st century AD) interpreted "a mighty hunter before the Lord" as "in opposition to the Lord"; a similar interpretation is found in Pseudo-Philo, as well as later in Symmachus. In Pseudo-Philo (dated ca. AD 70), HOWEVER, THE HEBREW "BEFORE THE LORD" IS USED IN THE SAME WAY SPEAKING OF ABRAHAM. MOSES AND THE DAVID. In other words, the Roman licensed "Rabbis" lied against the Ethiopian (Kushite) Nimrod and twisted the meaning of the clear Hebrew of the Massora (traditional) version of the Tanach - Genesis 10:8,9. Nimrod is made leader of the Hamites; while Joktan as leader of the Semites, and Fenech as leader of the Japhethites, are also associated with the building of the Tower.[3] Versions of this story are again picked up in later works such as Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius (7th century AD) repeating the lie and intentional corruption of the interpretation of the bible in much the same way as the so-called "Curse of Ham" racist myth.

Nimrod figures in some very early versions of the history of Freemasonry, where he was said to have been one of the fraternity's founders. According to the Encyclopedia of Freemasonry: The legend of the Craft in the Old Constitutions refers to Nimrod as one of the founders of Masonry. Thus in the York MS., No. 1, we read: "At ye making of ye toure of Babell there was a Masonrie first much esteemed of, and the King of Babilon yt called Nimrod was a Mason himself and loved well Masons." However, he does not figure in the current rituals.

EDITED BY: RAS IADONIS TAFARI
SUBSCRIBE Today! Give Thanks! Members Log-in: http://lionofjuda.ning.com ETHIOPIAN-HEBREW DIASPORA BLOG: http://EthiopianWorldFederation.ning.com & Order many RARE & INFORMATIVE DVDs http://lojsociety.org/docvideos


NIMROD tower babel babylon Big Black Hebrew Biblical Holy Bible Cush son Ham Kemet ETHIOPIAN Kushite Negro Nigger Boogyman DEMONIZED by rabbi racist Jewish khazar askenazi jews analysis conspiracy "middle east" commentary

Category:

Education

Tags:

• NIMROD
• tower
• babel
• babylon
• Big
• Black
• Hebrew
• Biblical
• Holy
• Bible
• Cush
• son
• Ham
• Kemet
• ETHIOPIAN
• Kushite
• Negro
• Nigger
• Boogyman
• DEMONIZED
• by
• rabbi
• racist
• Jewish
• khazar
• askenazi
• jews
• analysis
• conspiracy
• middle east
• commentary

[ToShineTime]

Nimrod of course did not exist as a real person. He is alleged in Biblical Mythology (not Written Attested History) to have been a king in Mesopotamia. However, The extensive and highly detailed King Lists of Sumer, Akkad, Assyria, Babylonia, Mari and Ebla make no mention whatsoever of such a king. He is a later Hebraic mythical creation, based on a combination earlier Mesopotamian Myths, Various Mesopotamian gods and kings, nothing more. In addition, Assyrians did not have Magis.

[Aghasian99]

@kinganubis76 Nope, it doesnt say that on Wikipedia, it says that the '''general ''Afro-asiatic set of languages could have originated 10,000 years ago, anywhere including The Mid East, Arabia, The Sahara, Egypt or Ethiopia. As for the Semitic branch, we know that particular branch came from the Mid East.

[Aghasian99]

@SelfTheSoulfuric Now, if all the cicilizations in Mesopotamia, Iran, India, the Mid East, Asia Minor, Greece and such came from Nubia/Ethiopia/Cush......They would have had to have writing, kings, civilisations first, to have educated all those places right? How comes then, that the first King in that part of the world only goes back to 795 BC, and Writing in that part of the world only goes back to 8th Century BC too??? That pretty much says it all really!

[Aghasian99]

@SelfTheSoulfuric =Alara was a King of Kush who is generally regarded as the founder of the Napatan royal dynasty and was the first recorded prince of Nubia-Cush in 795 BC. = There ya go..Alara is the first Black King recorded in history. Nubia/Kush only existed since 795 BC...Thousands of years after all those Civilizations you weirdly claim come from them! FIND ME A RECORD OF A KING IN ETHIOPIA, NUBIA OR KUSH BEFORE THAT!

[Aghasian99]

@kinganubis76 Semites didnt come from the Russian Steppes, you tool, they were living in Mesopotamia and Syria 5000 years back. And as for Writing; Indo-Aryan peoples like Greeks, Hittites, Luwians, Mitanni, Urartians/Armenians and Indians were Writing way before any Black folks were. The people in Sudan and Ethiopia had NO Writing before the 8th Century BC, and even then it was imported from Yemen!

[ToShineTime]

@SelfTheSoulfuric I am sorry to point this out, but Kushan and Hindu Kush in India, as well as the Kassites in Iran and the Sumerian city of Kish, have no entymological, linguistic, cultural, ethnic, Chronological or geographic link at all in any way shape or form with Cush in Sudan. Those claims are really rather ridiculous, and not supported by any Modern Scholar.

[ToShineTime]

@SelfTheSoulfuric Angelfire is a now defunct Website Hoster, wghereby just about anybody could post what they wished. Unfortunately, the author who you are cutting and pasting is very clearly not an historian,but a charlatan with absolutely no idea at all about what he is talking. Do you in all honesty choose to regard this as Serious, accurate, historical study?

[ToShineTime]

@SelfTheSoulfuric Unfortunately, Massey was a charlatan, an amateur and not accurate or academically sound in any way. Which is why he is not regarded as relevant by Modern Egyptologists.

[ToShineTime]

@kinganubis76 As two people have mentioned here already, Black "Headed" means black haired, not black skinned. And the Sumerian Language was NOT related to any Negro-African language, past or present.It was both a "Language Isolate" and an "Agglutinative" Language. You might wish it to be an African Language, but it was not, that is an indesputable fact. Hence, Cuneiform Script, Sumerian, Akkadian, Elamite, Aramaic, Hebrew languages being Non Existant in Africa, utterly unattested.

[ToShineTime]

@kinganubis76 Writing on Clay and Stone Tablets was earlier By Far, than any papyrus. Writing was clearly not invented in Africa, only an ignoramus would claim that. In addition, Papyrus writing was Egyptian...please Google Images Egyptian Mummies and then Google Images Nubian Mummies...you will see the Egyptians were not Negro either..Modern Egyptian DNA is 90% Same as Ancient Egyptian by the way! Negros had no bearing on Ancient History.