Inside The Brotherhood - Episode One (Part 1 of 3)

A six part documentary looking into allegations of corruption inside Freemasonry.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• Inside
• The
• Brotherhood
• Episode
• One
• Part
• of
• xvid
• mason
• freemason
• P2
• Ldge
• corruption
• police
• government
• court
• judge
• crown
• royalty

[ruaryno]

Good deeds are done in the light of day (out in the open). Dark acts are performed in secret. Choose your sides wisely or fear the day the light shines upon you.

[flipbond]

Alan Watt is a person putting himself out there to educate those who can still think for themselves. Those who think he is a mason just because of his knowledge obviously can't still think for themselves. This is a man working for no money and giving out information that can isolate a person from friends and society, how does that make him a person benefiting from masonry!!?? He is only trying to warn those with any common sense left. Keep up the good fight Mr. Watt!!!!!!

[02Blackbeard]

Freemasons = Making bad men worse.

[irishgeal1]

where do i sign up.

[Afroxec]

@ruaryno ur an idiot and ezily fooled by anyone "doing a good deed" for fame. gtfo plz

[ParisLawStudent]

@UnoRaza

Just read the Royal Arch, 13th degree. I did not see what you are talking about. What edition are you reading? Perhaps therein lies the issue. As always, much appreciated.

[UnoRaza]

@ParisLawStudent If you study the blood rituals they take at the "Royal Arch" level, you'll see where the problems lie. "Lie to protect "brothers", including murder and TREASON.

[ParisLawStudent]

@UnoRaza

Because, having read it, I was not left with that impression. I am trying to discern from you your reasoning behind your opinion so that I may understand it better. Perhaps I am mistaken in my reading, and therefore your input could correct me. Perhaps not. Either way, I greatly appreciate your input and the respect with which you reply. Thanks.

[UnoRaza]

@ParisLawStudent "What evidence do you have that Masons are Luciferian?"

Why did you ask this question if you read Morals and Dogma?

[UnoRaza]

@ParisLawStudent "Finally, which 9th degree apron?"

Google their 9th degree apron; it symbolized the Holy Spirit removing ego; not "satanic", mind you and the Luciferian data was found in the interim.

'

[UnoRaza]

@ParisLawStudent You asked for the Luciferian references; thus Pike.

Again, once you resolve the Roman added Luciferian=Satan to the bible, you'll not find anything in writing, objectionable; JUST LIKE COMMUNISM. <--- Get it? Either it has been corrupted or it was, like so-called 'communism', their most profitable invention, fake by design.

The perfect Trojan Horse to allow ethical men and DEVILS at the same table.

[ParisLawStudent]

@UnoRaza

Addressing your second point first, I believe that today the common parlance uses "satanism" to refer to Anton Levay's (sp?) philosophy, which rejected a god and served humanist interests.

Next, I have read Morals and Dogma. The majority of the book seems unobjectionable, with the remaining being archaic allegory. Since you mentioned the 9th degree, I reread that section. Referencing standing up for the less fortunate seems honorable.

Finally, which 9th degree apron?

Thank you.