Limbaugh's "Operation Chaos" Illegal? (C-SPAN Wash Journal)

Limbaugh responds to this clip here:
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_031708/content/01125107.guest.html

Ari Melber replies here:
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=302317

Original Wired article:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2008/03/did-ohio-crosso.html

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• operationchaos
• rushlimbaugh
• crossovervoting
• clinton
• obama
• commentary
• analysis
• news

[xs4t4nxpur3x]

NERRDDDS!!!!!

[globalwrmngmyass]

Someone needs to tell this obviously government schooled idiot that there isn't a McC'l'ain running!

[ImWilson1]

The New Hampshire primary was held on January 8th. So when was this Dem. Nominee chosen?

Once again your statements do not hold water.

[happyjesucr]

You obviously have never followed an election. Over half the country is registered as Democrats and each election a Republican requires at least a 30% crossover. The Democratic platform is not uniform - many people support the ecoomic policies but not social liberalism, UN sovereignty, etc. I can't believe you ask that when your nominee has been chosen for three months and there are still half of people in most states voting for a lame duck primary candidate.

Have a nice day yourself.

[ImWilson1]

Explain to me why would Dems. change parties when their nominee has not been chosen. You seem to have no logic to your statements.

Have a nice day.

[happyjesucr]

And if you were following that as closely as you claim you would know that all of the charges were thrown out. I did not make up exit poll results, I just won't do your homework for you. Its not my fault if you weren't watching on election night, but if you would have paid attention to the RNC tracking you would see that is true instead of just worshipping Obama as the messiah. Anyway, have fun trying to make Keynesian economics work for the first time in history.

[ImWilson1]

Ohio's election code includes an election falsification clause(Revised Code 3513.20), which says that if a voter who changes parties is challenged by poll workers as to the sincerity of his change of heart and also signs an affidavit stating that he supports the principles of the party to which he's changing-when in fact he doesn't support them-then he would be committing election falsification. Election falsification is a felony that is punishable by 6 to 12 months in jail and a $2,500 fine.

[ImWilson1]

So you admit you just made that up.

Also you stated "It was determined no one would be charged in Ohio, sorry, voting is not a criminal act."

[happyjesucr]

I could care less about proving anything to you when anyone notices how much the "Republican" party supports McCain and exit polls and various other sources show he did not do well among mainstream conservative voters. And Limbaugh's effect on the Democratic primaries has been laughable if not negligible, Obama has recieved virtually an equivalent number of crossover votes as Hillary, if not more such as in Texas. I think this is typical scapegoating for your partys divide, like the race card.

[ImWilson1]

New Hampshire does not meet a common definition of an open primary, because people registered as Republican or Democrat on voting day cannot cast ballots in the primary of the other party. So once again I ask you to please give sources to your statement. How did Democrats, and I Quote, "Fucked up" many primaries to get McCain nominated. Give me one source that says that.