Video #18, "Rick's Pipe Dream" Magnetic Motor - Generator

My purpose in this video is to clear up a common misconception held by several viewers of my videos, which is that I should be employing some method in order to counter the effects of so-called "sticky points." I start by once again explaining what a sticky point is, and demonstrate how this - as well as undesired repulsion forces - can cause rotation to stop in a stationary stator setup. I then go on to explain and demonstrate why there is no need to employ methods to negate or weaken these forces with my moving stator setup. Quite simply, my MOSTAT (moving stator) method entirely avoids these counter rotational forces by moving in such a way as to turn them into productive, additive accelleration forces.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Magnetic
• Motor
• Generator
• MOSTAT
• Rickoff

[12gage12]

Hi rick I am very interested in your design and magnetic kinetic energy in general. I have been thinking if you use a coil that can produce the power to a magnet to give it the pull then shut off thus = not opening the chance to have a negative pull. You must have this motor a generating factor too supply the kinetic energy for the movement of the sticky point..

[TheRickoff]

Again I must point out that there are no sticky points with the moving stator design. A moving stator avoids these. Your suggestion of using a pulsed coil electromagnet would certainly work, but the object here is to build a magnetic motor that requires no electrical input. The only question, really, is what method of moving the stator will prove to work best. Methods acceptable in this project include mechanical, magnetic, and gravity movements, and any combination of these.

[knowledgemonger]

The point about the fixed stator does apply to the moving stator case also. Go back through the argument with the pole on the stator moving and you will see that it still holds with the added complication that you must account for the energy needed to move the stator pole. Without the energy you provide by moving the pole, the wheel will come to a stop. I will comment further on this last bit on the video #19 comments.

[knowledgemonger]

If you actually made the measurements of what onthecuttingedge2005 was suggesting and made the graph you would see.

[onthecuttingedge2005]

Ordinary Magnets are made of Stable Isotopes, their fields are very stable and do not fluctuate on their own without some constant input. however, Unstable Magnetic Isotopes are radioactive, when ever a radioactive magnet decays or excepts a particle its magnetic field will expand or collapse back to ground state, Radioactive magnets can act as a constant moving stator field because of their fluctuating magnetic fields. regular magnets need a constant input of energy of some kind.

[TheRickoff]

k.m. - "In this machine the person is providing the energy by moving a magnet with his hand." That is a false assumption and is proven false in video #19.

[TheRickoff]

k.m. - "This proves that no combination of fixed poles can produce a non-zero average torque." You are entirely missing the point, and have simply wasted your time in describing the inefficiencies of fixed pole configurations. They don't apply to a moving stator.

[TheRickoff]

jblough666 - you have hit the nail squarely on the head, and are quite right. And if the 2 accellerative forces (F2) at each 90 degrees of rotation, plus the force imparted by the flywheel momentum (F3) are greater than the force required for each movement of the stator (F2) then the game is won. :)

[TheRickoff]

o.t.c.e. - Yes, and that is the case with my moving stator method. But are you saying that a stationary stator can work as well as a MOSTAT? If so, give us a link to show your stationary stator build in action.