It's Priceless (Part Two)

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
524 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Nov 7, 2009

Tom Price (R-GA) asked a question about the debate taking place in the House. His question was never answered. Apparently it's never a good time to object to an unanimous consent or raise a parliamentary inquiry.

I had some issues with my MacBook, so this second part was produced on my PC, so I apologize in advance.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

License:

Standard YouTube License

  • likes, 4 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:

Top Comments

  • He is objecting to people asking for additional remarks to placed in the record, this is normally granted fully to both sides since the house does not have the time to hear all members in full. Basically he is trying to stall for time either to kill the bill or just to act like a d**k.

  • Price is acting like a 2 year old, I feel sorry for everyone that is republican. He is objecting before anything is being said. He knows the bill will be passed, trying his best to delay it. You guys are douchebags

see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why don't they just object to he unanimous consent request rather than "reserving the right to object". Dingell may be very out of it here, but it is correct about that 1 ruling: a member cannot reserve the right to object after a demand for the regular order is made.

  • @SurfingJesus Douchebaggery when not getting your way is normal for most republicans =P

  • The CHAIR is out of order!

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more