Moon Myth BUSTED! Flag in a Vacuum

How does a flag in a vacuum behave when disturbed? Does it behave the same when under normal atmospheric conditions on earth? The moon hoaxers seem to have convinced themselves that they behave the same. But they don't have the guts to back up their claims with experimentation, but the MYTHBUSTERS do!

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• flag
• moon
• apollo
• vacuum
• hoax
• myth
• jarrah
• white
• greenmagoos

[gulbirk]

OF COURSE THE FLAG CAN MOVE. Note that every time the flag moves (on moon landing footage) its when someone touches it. The metal bar at the top swings= The flag swings.

Denider are fucking morons.

[rogerpenna]

@marshalllucky

there are more proof that men went to the moon than that NY is located in the USA.

[SirMildred76]

@Goddamnit169 "is refering to blast craters from the blast off-not the landing."

you can see in the LRO photos that there is much disturbance around the area of the lunar lander. But you have to remember that when they took off they detatched the ascent stage from the descent stage. The blast would be directed on to the descent stage as opposed to the lunar surface itself.

In photos of the lander's feet you can see material blown on top as well as material compacted underneath.

[Goddamnit169]

@alnilam66 anewlow23 is refering to blast craters from the blast off-not the landing. if you are sure dust was kicked up then why were the footpads or landing feet completely dust free? if you are relying on nasa propaganda and their biased proofs then you need to look elsewhere. don't forget, nasa has the worlds largest vacuum chamber-so the idiots did not prove nasa went to the moon with reasonble proof. it could be the vacuum chamber on Earth was used to film- it is all one big lie

[alnilam66]

@anewlow23 because the astronauts cut the engine off when the foot probes touch the surface. This was to prevent a blowback,and eng explosion. The eng did kick up some dust,but did not create a blast crater

[anewlow23]

If the moon landing wasn't fake then why is there no blast crater in photos below the lunar lander?

[Simwillb]

@wildbill6976 I'm sorry, was my tangible arguement - NASA just could have easily used training vacuums filled with dirt to trick the populas - too complex for a person who can think up a joke like - shit for brains - comedy classic. Are you sure you dont work for NASA, because they're answers are bigger jokes than the epic 'shit for brains' gag. Remember these are people who say floating 'ice particles' can deccelerate, stop dead, do 136 degree turns and accelerate.

[mikesomething]

@rogerpenna why are there no new missions ? why are there no new documentaries "inside nasa how they did it", or some such. it would be very interesting, but all there ever is is old photos and video and "yeah we went to the moon"

why dont they point the hubble at the moon and photo the stuff left up there ? why dont they use the lunar satellites to photo the stuff left there ? just like google earth ?

what proof are you on about ? old pictures + your dad told you ?

[Scorpiomerlin61]

If you notice, he moves the flag quite a bit more the second time.

[wildbill6976]

@Simwillb So with that argument, could we also assume that you have shit for brains just because no one has split your head open to look inside and see yet?

[skevoid]

@infinitewobdrahpa He forgot a doozy, the Saturn V rocket is three-stage. Two thirds of the rocket fell back to earth and didn't have to be re-launched from the moon!

[MrEdwinauer]

@cut maybe becuase of gravity? Instead of an atmosphere? ROFL