9/11 Ten Years Later The World Trade Center Is Still Claiming Lives

These people deserve respect, full medical coverage for their ailments, and compensation. Rudy Giuliani and his mayors office told the people the air is safe to breathe, wash your eyes out if you have a hard time breathing, Why did he lie about the air quality and not take the proper precautions that OSHA would have taken working in that environment? Rudy was worried about removing the evidence, first priority, people come second to criminals. Cancer is not covered because Rudy would be personally liable for criminal negligence and fraud. Everything after 9/11 was an inside job, the responders are still dying from negligence. These people should have recieved proper medical treatment years ago, this is a disgrace and a slap in the face to every American. These people deserve respect for their sacrifice and service, not to be shunned and ripped off by Mayor Bloomberg and his criminal cartel of 9/11 insiders.

Category:

News & Politics

Tags:

• 9/11
• Anniversary
• 911
• September
• 11th
• 2001
• 9/11/2001
• WTC7
• World
• Trade
• Center
• WTC
• Guiliani
• Cheney
• Bush
• Mullens
• Mueller
• Obama
• Holder
• DOD
• Justice
• truth
• Afghanistan
• Iraq
• Bin
• Laden
• Al-Qaeda
• FOIA
• NIST
• Iran-Contra
• Drugs
• Terror
• Terrorism
• False
• Flag
• Eyewitness
• Explosion
• Bomb
• Bombs
• Explosions
• Decade
• Years
• Truth
• Fact
• Facts

[TheSherrykelly]

Shut the front door Boys.. We need a powwow

[danp5648]

@IranContraScumDid911 unified theory means a large very mini nuke with highly engineered Nano Thermite implosion. The NASA heat maps I am talking about also contain heat sources that lasted for over three months and large part of the WTC was NOT removed but rather buried over. Air samples and cancer rates also suggest mini-nuke. Cancer location match the Chernobyl disaster. 9/11 Birth defects also match the Chernobyl disaster. Land fills around NYC complained about ratio active material.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@danp5648 Explosives release a very high amount of energy in a very short period of time creating heat, they also are used to demolish buildings.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@dan The evidence confirms what really happened, no theories needed. The destruction of the towers was highly engineered, not some slop job with a bomb at the base that would have caused the towers to topple over 1/4 mile in an unknown direction, nor some new top secret frequency or light weapon. In science, the engineering Judy was taught, they tell her exactly what causes a high velocity gas ejection, how to determine its power, and that explosives turn concrete to dust and demolish buildings

[danp5648]

@IranContraScumDid911 The nuke at the base data is consistent with data I already listed and has nothing to do with the WTC fireworks and Energy weapons i.e mini nukes had nothing to do high velocity gas ejections. They do have something to do (maybe) with the NASA heat map. Also the NASA heat map shows one heat source away from the WTC complex. I don't think you understand what unified theory is. Also Infrared FLIR Video of WTC Burning by Carol Ciemiengo shows a second hotspot.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@danp Aliens had bigfoot fart on the towers, watch any collapse video and tell me there was a nuke at the base that caused the top to shoot out like fireworks. Explain in detail the dynamics of how that is possible. If some idiot approached you and said use a nuke, but dont collapse the surrounding buildings, except WTC 7, you would laugh in their face. There are THOUSANDS of explosion videos, not one have I seen or heard a nuke. Energy weapons that cause internal high velocity gas ejections?

[danp5648]

@IranContraScumDid911 I believe your scientific observation leaves out too many data points to be complete. NIST uses the same words i.e likely .. so we know likely does not equal valid. I don't see how a unified theory has internal conflicts just yet and you have yet to listed the conflicts. If you know of any conflicts please list them for me. thanks

[IranContraScumDid911]

@danp I am not trying to debate the subject, just using scientific observation. When all the evidence is unified both Judy and Khazelov are debunked. They choose isolated evidence to build a theory, even when other evidence disproves the possibility of their theory. We know what they use to demolish buildings, we know how it demolishes buildings, we see its effects on 9/11, and we find evidence of it on the steel and in the dust. There is no need for alternate theories, the most likely is likely

[danp5648]

@IranContraScumDid911 I believe all that data is still valid 1. hundreds of visible explosive detonations, with flashes in the dust that leave smoke puffs etc. The nuke was in the bedrock and I not sure what effect it had. However the incinerated security guard and the seismic data combined with Dimitri Khalezov does point to mini nuke for the center. Maybe the nuke was part of the directed energy weapon theory by Dr. Judy Woods. This combination with nano thermite metal flakes.

[IranContraScumDid911]

@danp5648 Then we have a top down sequence with hundreds of visible explosive detonations, with flashes in the dust that leave smoke puffs. There are four clear loud audible explosions in the core implosion. I can easily verify the building did not drop into its basement, not even several feet during the blasting of the exterior facade. A nuke would be one big sloppy blast, not the surgical precision sequence we see on 9/11. I can go on, but lets not worry about it. Nukes cannot be controlled