The Science Of Eternity (Part 8)

The greatest question affecting each and every human being is the question of death and dying. Do we simply cease to exist or do we pass quite naturally into the next world? Astounding personal encounters with supposedly dead relatives coupled with new scientific evidence based on quantum physics - the study of the invisible part of the universe - suggests that WE ALL SURVIVE death.

Written and presented by Alan Pemberton this 60 minute video features:

Ronald Pearson - This scientist's papers linking survival after death with subatomic physics have been peer-refereed and published by physicists in Russia and the USA.

Michael Roll - The author of the pamphlet 'The Scientific Proof of Survival After Death'.

Gwen and Alf Byrne - These parents have been physically reunited with their "dead" son, Russell, in several hundred repeatable experiments.

Tom Harrison - He tells the story of his the incredible mediumship of his mother, Minnie Harrison, who was one of the greatest materialisation mediums ever to make contact with people in the etheric universe.

David Icke - Talks about life after death.

Category:

People & Blogs

Tags:

• Michael
• Roll
• Ronald
• Pearson
• Gwen
• Byrne
• Tom
• Harrison
• David
• Icke
• Alan
• Pemberton

[AusDavid12]

Evan though the materialist atheist and religionist are firmly against these findings, I am of the opinion that the evidence will become so completely overwhelming that in the end the debunkers will become irrelevant. Keep reading and learning from good research (avoiding religionist, spiritualist and debunker "science"). We live in interesting times.

[AusDavid12]

I agree with what you say. I do not want to accept something because it might happen to be "Satisfying and reassuring" What would be the point of that?

There are people who either don't like the idea of an afterlife who are bias just as there are the other way around. Yes avoid debunker because they are simply in the bussiness of debunking not objective research.

Keep the researh going and make of it what you will.

[Virasana]

@AnduinX Also that's rubbish about 'discarding conflicting evidence' no good scientist will EVER discard true evidence, what they will do is use rational common sense and discard rubbish which someone has labeled 'evidence' because it's what they'd like to believe, when it is clearly NOT evidence at all. No human being be they a neuro-scientist or a mystic pagan witch knows just how many brain cells are required to 'think'. Not knowing how something works doesnt mean it's magic.

[Virasana]

@AnduinX I think it is you who have it the wrong way around, the scientists believed the world was round and had to prove it to the others who - without good education quite understandably -couldn't conceptualise how mass & gravity might work.

[AnduinX]

@Virasana: I don't think your moon example is accurate in this example. In my view it is the materialists that are holding science back, not the other way around. They're more like the Flat-Earthers who laughed at the notion that the Earth was round.

[AnduinX]

@Virasana: In order to hold a materialist view you must discard and dismiss a great deal of conflicting evidence. Such as terminal lucidity and severe hydrocephalus, where people with a small fraction of the brain mass of a normal person can think, remember, and act normally. Also there are NDEs and OBEs were people knew things they could not possibly have known. The 'best' theory would be one that fits with ALL of the evidence.

[Entropian2012]

@Virasana You going to be pleasently suprized when you die ^^

[Virasana]

No of course I can't prove it. And yes it is based on an assumption, but the assumption is based on the evidence currently available to us. Even as the countdown ticked away for the first moon landing it was an assumption that we would be able to put man on the moon. We chose to ignore the people who said it's not possible and used common sense rather than ignore the quite obvious evidence that we could acheive that goal, & we did. Same thing!

It will be likewise in this case too.

[AnduinX]

@Virasana: Can you prove this assertion, that when our body dies, we die? Of course not, because it's based on the assumption that the brain produces consciousness, which is an unproven assumption.

[scabycat]

@Virasana " when u die u no longer exist"- The basic laws of physics dictate that u can neither create nor destroy energy, u can only change it into something else. So whereas our physical bodies turn to dust, what happens to our conciousness? Conciousness is Energy, just like everything else. It simply MUST go somewhere so where does it go?? After researching this subject for quite some time now, I am convinced there is no such thing as death. Just checkout the EVIDENCE

[dawnafternight]

I absolutely adore David Icke.Good on you David keep on doing a great job

[Virasana]

@k0smon When we sleep we are not dead. We still exist. Our hearts still beat & our brains still work. We dream, another form fantasy seems absolutely real, but we both know dreams are not actualy hapening in reality. They are dreams.

You say "reason for continuation of life" Do you have children? Life already makes a pretty damned good job of continuing itself in each new individual. But when that individual dies, as when a fly dies, it simply no longer exists.