@agapeiron How is it "running and hiding" to ask that something be public? That's the opposite of running and hiding you moronic troll. My attitude towards the truth is that it should be openly available, which to you of course is disgusting. I specifically called the site seriously liar. The offer to discuss it publically remains open and you remanin a liar who is running away. Your only ostensible objection is that I might use the result, what of it?
@agapeiron I am interested in showing you're a lying, sociopathic wannabe murderer. I am not dodging anything, I have offered repeatedly to discuss this openly but only openly. You suddenly insisted it be by PM only AFTER I specifically said that I would not accept that. Together with your constant dodging on whether you would even read the evidence it's clearly that you have no interest in discussing anything, only in lying and being a fucktard untill I get sick of you and go away.
@newperve If you are not interested in discussion for its own sake, then why do you keep responding to my comments? At least you've given up the "grrr, fucktard!" tactic.
No, I was specific I wasn't about to let you suck on our discussion on some blog.
If you are dodging any serious colloquy, I won't even send you my thoughts on the jim.com site.
If you change your mind and want to discuss the matters for their intrinsic intellectual value, message me.
@newperve I asked you for private discussion of the matter over and over again. You ran and hid each time, calling me names, etc. Now I am ready to discuss the matter in depth, consulting your web site, and you'll only do so if you can squeeze some political capital out of it.
Disgusting, opportunistic attitude towards the truth.
You lose, as you have lost again and again, using rhetoric, name-calling and a site you refused to qualify as remotely serious.
@agapeiron I said I wouldn't and then you said you wouldn't read the evidence if I didn't, so I said OK I will. Now you're saying you won't discuse this if it will be used for "propaganda value" i.e. if anyone else can see it. There are not two choices liar, there are many. We can discuss this in any public forum you like as long as you don't censor it. I am not interested in discussion with you for it's own sake because you are a lying bigot impossible to convince.
@agapeiron "It can be [your blog] as long as you don't censor what I say", so clearly I'm not turning this discussion into anything for the sake of my blog. But run away that's what you're best at. So you're officially saying you won't conduct a debate in any forum but private messaging after I specifically said it had to be public. Fine you lose.
If you're going to turn this discussion into a vendetta against me for the sake of your blog, I am not going to participate. Sorry; I have no need for internet schizophrenics.
I will read the site you pasted anyways with an open mind. But I am not about to join you in your little section of the blogosphere. If you change your mind and want a rational discussion, private message me.
Supremely wonderful video, couldn't agree more.
thesparitan 6 months ago
DOODS anyone who doesn't want everything to be free public domain is an evil capitalist who only views everyone and everything as capital.
hotfudgemoney 6 months ago
@agapeiron How is it "running and hiding" to ask that something be public? That's the opposite of running and hiding you moronic troll. My attitude towards the truth is that it should be openly available, which to you of course is disgusting. I specifically called the site seriously liar. The offer to discuss it publically remains open and you remanin a liar who is running away. Your only ostensible objection is that I might use the result, what of it?
newperve 7 months ago
@agapeiron I am interested in showing you're a lying, sociopathic wannabe murderer. I am not dodging anything, I have offered repeatedly to discuss this openly but only openly. You suddenly insisted it be by PM only AFTER I specifically said that I would not accept that. Together with your constant dodging on whether you would even read the evidence it's clearly that you have no interest in discussing anything, only in lying and being a fucktard untill I get sick of you and go away.
newperve 7 months ago
@newperve If you are not interested in discussion for its own sake, then why do you keep responding to my comments? At least you've given up the "grrr, fucktard!" tactic.
No, I was specific I wasn't about to let you suck on our discussion on some blog.
If you are dodging any serious colloquy, I won't even send you my thoughts on the jim.com site.
If you change your mind and want to discuss the matters for their intrinsic intellectual value, message me.
agapeiron 7 months ago
@newperve I asked you for private discussion of the matter over and over again. You ran and hid each time, calling me names, etc. Now I am ready to discuss the matter in depth, consulting your web site, and you'll only do so if you can squeeze some political capital out of it.
Disgusting, opportunistic attitude towards the truth.
You lose, as you have lost again and again, using rhetoric, name-calling and a site you refused to qualify as remotely serious.
agapeiron 7 months ago
@agapeiron I said I wouldn't and then you said you wouldn't read the evidence if I didn't, so I said OK I will. Now you're saying you won't discuse this if it will be used for "propaganda value" i.e. if anyone else can see it. There are not two choices liar, there are many. We can discuss this in any public forum you like as long as you don't censor it. I am not interested in discussion with you for it's own sake because you are a lying bigot impossible to convince.
newperve 7 months ago
@agapeiron "It can be [your blog] as long as you don't censor what I say", so clearly I'm not turning this discussion into anything for the sake of my blog. But run away that's what you're best at. So you're officially saying you won't conduct a debate in any forum but private messaging after I specifically said it had to be public. Fine you lose.
newperve 7 months ago
@newperve Alright, last comment.
If you're going to turn this discussion into a vendetta against me for the sake of your blog, I am not going to participate. Sorry; I have no need for internet schizophrenics.
I will read the site you pasted anyways with an open mind. But I am not about to join you in your little section of the blogosphere. If you change your mind and want a rational discussion, private message me.
Take care.
agapeiron 7 months ago
@newperve A or B? Make a decision, I'm tired and have things to do.
agapeiron 7 months ago