Inside Russian nuclear sub

You normally have to be an enlisted seaman with unquestionable loyalty to see what this video shows. Take a look at the interior of a real-deal Russian nuclear submarine one of those that had to start havoc in the U.S. in case of a war against the Soviet Union.

Category:

Science & Technology

Tags:

• Russia
• Soviet
• Union
• nuclear
• submarine
• havoc
• missile
• war
• US

[q10800]

@jmorello123 зарубежная пропаганда работает как часы, обидно, лучше бы жили дружно (Russian)

[andy42x]

@jmorello123 He said, "It's simple... whatever he hits.... he destroys"

[TheGratziani]

@normison69 loool..i know very well ur mother (before she have 100 kg...eating borsh...with shit)..ur navy is a shit and daily u have an accident!, this is the reason ur shit subs are pursued by...last 50 yrs u had more than 50 accidents 0 level...so go eat some shit..but wash ur mouth before coming here.

[normison69]

@TheGratziani Erm it was built in 1988 and is pretty new for a sub. This video is clearly made during early 90's. Russian fleet has modernized their subs in a big way after the Kursk accident and not just the subs but also the training of the crew has been much improved since. Now in 2012 it still causes fear in heart of US and NATO commanders eachtime it leaves harbor, being almost always pursued by American subs? Why is that if its so shit? You are a moron who knows about shit cuz you eat it.

[memadmax69]

wow, way way way way too noisy...

[TheGratziani]

I imagine this movie right before Kursk prepare drill..lol...shit smells better than this crap..see flying cables and 50 yo technologies they are happy here with...the torpedoes are same Kursk model also...

[TheXand19]

Great, now I want to see inside of a good submarine.

[matthewbattenfelder9]

wow, those guys dont like each other

[VisionarysDomain]

@Sp33dyD3m0n

oh, is that the best you can come up with. How about you kiss Obama's ASS for cancelling the shuttle program and having 4,000 of your engineers layed off SHIT HEAD !

[VisionarysDomain]

@Sp33dyD3m0n

I read what you wrote. You clearly stated that Apollo technology was shelved. Now you make the excuse that the shuttle was designed for only sub orbit excursions when you damn well now the design was flawed to begin with. Ask the 4,000 engineers that have been layed off from Nasa recently and argue with them since you obviously possess a degree in aeronautical engineering !

[Sp33dyD3m0n]

@VisionarysDomain How do you keep missing the USES of each vehicle? We have to use rockets to go into deep space, we never stopped making rockets, only stopped making rockets for human space travel. Shuttles cannot go into deep space, you are digging for shit that just isn't there. Why don't you go kiss Putins ass and I'll go enjoy my freedoms.