Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince Review(Overhyped or Great Adaptation?)

go to http://furyofthefilmfan.net for new reviews, movie news and much much more!

Category:

Education

Tags:

• harry
• potter
• and
• the
• half
• blood
• prince
• fury
• of
• film
• fan
• movie
• critic
• internet
• hogwarts
• dumbledore
• snape
• draco
• trailer
• hd
• high
• definition
• imax
• summer
• blockbuster
• david
• yates
• warner
• brothers
• wb
• magic
• spells
• hermoine
• ron
• weasley
• ginny
• daniel
• radcliff

[kingbooforums]

what do you look like?

[FuryoftheFilmFan]

I am horribly disfigured but have a voice on an

Angel.

[kingbooforums]

I wish people were not socially insecurable about there identity lol.

[FuryoftheFilmFan]

I'm not insecure, My face is irrelevant when I'm talking about a movie.

[0410warner]

I didn't like how they didn't develop Snape's character.

I mean, the movie DOES have his moniker in the title, and they didn't even fully explain the significance of that.

They just BARELY played around with the question of whether he is a good guy or a bad guy. A viewer of this movie doesn't get the full understanding of Snape's complex character or his motivations.

And oh yeah, Dumbledore's death was kind of anticlimatic too.

[FuryoftheFilmFan]

I agree, when he revealed HE was the half blood prince all I said was "but why?"

They didn't delve into his intentions just used some facial expressions to show he might be sorry for what hes doing. BLAHHHHHhh, I needed more.

[RosefulEvelyns]

Haha. 0:26 Just like Hitchcock!!

[powerfultoa7]

The film on itself was OK in general and succeeds somewhat in what it was trying to accomplish. But why some fans are complaining is due to some parts of the book being left out or not fully explained, a majority of which are very IMPORTANT that precedes Deathly Hallows.

[fatmanrock44]

So, the film doesn't explain alot? I guess I need to re-title the movie....

Harry Potter and the half-finished Script. Like it?

[EllenHoust]

Okay, look I could explain several reasons why your wrong here. Personally I felt that this was one of the most fluid Potter films yet. Most other Potter films feel disjointed and just slapped together. Not this one. It doesn't have as many huge explosions that the past potter films had, but it's not meant to. It's much more contemplative and for somebody who knows where it's going (who I think take up most of the audience) it's riveting.

[gaaraofthedesert1996]

the movie just didnt explain anything and had no real climax. because of this it just felt like it was leading you to the next movie and not its own special thing.

[1ockedand1oaded]

after the prisoner of azkaban these movies just keep on going down. (as in after that movie)

[Eceethreeon]

I thought this was the best Harry Potter film ever made. Plain and simple.

[HoodSta93]

daniel radcliffe just gets worse and worse

[Rahhelthethird]

I think he meant the death part. It's kinda obvious who you mean even not knowing the books.

[AngelMoonGirl]

If you do not want the film spoiled I will not tell you who dies, but obviously someone does. Really tho... the books are out. Most ppl know who I'm refering to. But aren't you worried watching the review will include a spoiler?