Rolls Royce Phantom Coupe Review & Road test
Top Comments
All Comments (190)
-
@jgpwlcs36 Obviosley, Benz is just a "cheap" car compared to this or any other Rolls Royce. It's built to perfection, unlike a s-class
-
Sexy beast.
-
is the difference between this and a s-class really worth the price?
-
he meant to say australian dollars
-
@dustinthewind09 i completely agree
-
@mthlaxer What I was originally saying a few comments ago is that this car is completely useless. Since it is a coupe it is not meant to be ridden in, and since it lacks the performance of a Ferrari or Lamborghini of equivalent value, it is overpriced. I guess I don't see the point of buying it unless the owner wants to flaunt their money.
-
if you can afford one in Australia, you can effortlessly afford two in US
-
@dustinthewind09 If you wanted a car to get driven around in you would NEVER buy this car. it is a coupe meaning that the back to seats are going to be smaller then the one is the front. plus there is no divide in between the diver area and the rear seats. it would also be annoying to get in and out of the back seat seeing as you would have to slide the front seat up and fold it down. if you want the best of both worlds get a Bentley continental GT or super sport
-
@dustinthewind09 if you want to ride in the back get a ghost...



@YourFatClownAss I believe it comes down to a choice between performance and comfort. A Ferrari F40 for example is stripped of the creature comforts for pure performance, whereas this car has to add horsepower to make up for its extra weight. Choosing between comfort and performance comes down to the owner. A true driver deserves a manual gearbox and zero driver aids. A true rider deserves leather seats and foot massages. This is a car meant to be driven by someone you pay. Not someone like me.
dustinthewind09 1 year ago 12
@KayC604 It's a coupe though. I would totally understand if it was a four-door. Why have luxury when you aren't riding in the back?
dustinthewind09 1 year ago 7