Income - Fact or Fiction

A film with judicial flare about the meaning of "income". Apparently Webster was early to recognize truth and seems to forget things these days.

Category:

Education

Tags:

• Ron
• Paul
• income
• Alan
• Stang
• Irwin
• Schiff
• USC-26
• tax
• profit
• gain

[RetSquid]

@nonnagfuckshit

A "bot"? Well, if you can prove anything that I have posted wrong, go for it.

[nonnagfuckshit]

@RetSquid is an irs bot .haha send a guy to jail for the rest of his life. bet you were happy when they hung osama ... oh wait they didnt .

[JackKangaroo1]

@Macedon51 You and the lunatic fringe that follows Irwin Schiff have argued incessantly that government cannot tax income on anything but a corporation. In order to continue this absurd assertion you must remain ignorant of every court decision on the matter, all of which have upheld the government's authority to tax personal income in the form of wages, business profit, winning the lottery, etc. If you don't believe this, just refuse to pay. I'm sure Schiff could use some company in prison.

[waterchildtera]

what i work for is my private property i dont get my time and life back and the government does not own me ! they did not make me GOD and my parents did they have lied to me , cheated me , and flat out stolen from me! they wage war against me and my fellow persons they take more and more and just squander it away they drive off our jobs inflate our currency make tons of profits and act like im stealing to keep what is MINE ! TAXED ON ALL SIDES ! WELL ENOUGH ! REVOLUTION! REVOLUTION! REVOLT!

[Macedon51]

@JackKangaroo1

Cangaroo, you are either ignorant of the facts or misleading the debate (per the provocateur RetSquid).

Nobody argues the government can't tax income.

Rather, what is income is in question.

Evidently, it is corporate profit.

[denalaurens]

@JackKangaroo1 Websters is a dictionary, not a Judge who rules on the Constitutionality of laws or issues. He made the distinction between both when he stated " I do not know if Webster was ever brought into court as an expert witness since 1913 seems to be the year money began to be created from nothing." In other words, the courts disagreed with Webster's definition. The vid was spot on with no repeated bogus anything. Just fact.

[RetSquid]

Peter Hendrickson inmate number #15406-039, FCI Milan, P.O. Box 1000, E. Arkona Rd, Milan, MI 48160

33 months to go...

[RetSquid]

@FredandShell

How do you like Pete's prison sentence? LOL!!!

[JackKangaroo1]

This tape is self-contradictory. It begins by quoting Webster's dictionary defining income as "That gain which proceeds from labor......" etc. and then tries to insist that income from labor is not "gain." Later it says that you cannot "derive" income by rendering services but Webster defines the word "derive" as "to obtain / to receive from another"....as when an employer pays your wages perhaps? This video consists of the repeated bogus insistence that common words are being misinterpreted.

[JackKangaroo1]

Thank you "RetSquid" for some much-needed clarification. This whole argument that the gov't cannot tax personal income is silly, as is the presumption that gov't serves no real purpose other than to oppress the People. The much larger issue raised by Ron Paul and others is the rampant deficit spending of gov't on all levels that has helped make us the biggest debtor nation on earth. It has to stop or we will destroy our currency entirely with the cruelest tax of all---hyper-inflation.