Alert icon
We're changing our privacy policy. This stuff matters.  Learn more  Dismiss

Broadcast Now Episode 15 "My youtube resolution"

Loading...

Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon
Upgrade to the latest Flash Player for improved playback performance. Upgrade now or more info.
159 views
Loading...
Alert icon
Sign in or sign up now!
Alert icon

Uploaded by on Aug 24, 2011

Join host Stephen Heywood and his co-host Erik Lanigan and Vance Willis as they talk about content distribution to youtube? Also what resolutions work best for streaming? Here on Episode 15 of Broadcast Now!

  • likes, 1 dislikes

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (5)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @ThinkingBrainFilms I don't quite understand what you're trying to say here, but I will note however that there are hardware encoding cards on the market.

  • In addition to that post below, hardware solutions for switching in live streaming mean next to nothing because the encoding and transmitting of the stream to the net will always take place in software. For example, one of the setups in our studio is to do everything on a tricaster, and then send the signal to the vidblaster machine for streaming because it can do multiple encodings on one machine.

    As an extra comment, there is a guy on justin.tv the streams 1080p video at 5000kbps for free.

  • There are a few reasons that the "lag" and quality will drop. Chief among witch is your processor. At the studio I work at we use this beast of a machine with the top of the line i7 and this will stream a 720p signal at 3mbps, 30p, with only 3-4 seconds of lag. On the older core 2 duo imac, using the same settings, there is close to 30-40 seconds of lag with lots of artifacts because the processor can't handle the load. Also justin.tv, ustream, ect. add lag to your signal because of processing.

  • A few things I'd love to hear about:

    1) What can we expect from a modern high range i7 setup with a software switcher? Can they handle multi cam HD, overlays, etc? What are the limitations?

    2) HD streaming suits the tech demographic, but is probably too high for a mainstream audience. Any suggested bitrates and resolutions to capitalize on a broader international audience? Maybe 853x480p as an ideal alternative?

  • You can encode at whatever bitrate you want, and as high as you want. The codec will not cause lag, dropped frames, etc. Those errors occur because of hardware and connection limitations on either the encoding or decoding end.

Loading...

Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more