4409 -- (Unseen Footage) Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle!

READ THIS: Post to TWITTER AND FACEBOOK for JUSTICE

**4409 Activist Store** https://www.wepay.com/stores/4409-store

Thank you to all who have spread this video and the message~

Remember, YOU have the power to Unite people! YOU have the power to change things!

YOU have the power to NEVER give in to tyranny!

YOU have the power to stand your ground and say enough!

This is YOUR country and YOU are America!

┌───────────────────────────────────────­───────┐
► Please Support our Work by Subscribing and sharing the video on Facebook and Twitter. All of This Is Done For You ◄ Go to the 4409 store at https://www.wepay.com/stores/4409-store
────────────────────────────────────────­─────

Firefighter quotes on 9/11 about explosive in the buildings:

BOMBS IN THE BUILDINGS?

"There was just an explosion in the south tower. It seemed like on television when they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions."

- NYFD Firefighter Richard Banaciski

BOMBS IN THE BUILDINGS?

"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We think there were bombs set in the building."

- NYFD Firefighter Louie Cacchioli

BOMBS IN THE BUILDINGS?

"It was as if as if they had detonated ... as if they had planned to take down a building, boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom-boom "

- NYFD Captain Dennis Tardio

unseen 911 world trade center buildings seven trade 7 WTC strange things in 911 footage

9/11 ANNIVERSARY 9/11/2012


(Unseen Footage) of Tower 7 blasted into rubble from NEW angle. miley cyrus

• Category

  Nonprofits & Activism

[smitty121981]

"I've been giving you that answer since you started asking it!" No, that's the first time you actually typed "the building fell symmetrically". Before you were just simply alluding to it but not going all the way there because you didn't want to validate me. It's ok, I understand. ♥

"Which makes perfect sense in a natural collapse." Hmm.. but that's only your opinion and I strongly disagree. Do you have any sources or examples which would help further clarify/validate your point?

[cantonear1968]

What do you mean "finally"? I've been giving you that answer since you started asking it!

I find myself repeating that asking the same question over and over that has been answered does NOT mean you are participating in the conversation!

"must have occurred approximately simultaneously"

Which makes perfect sense in a natural collapse. If failures are occurring, removing support from the building, the rest of the remaining supports would not be expected to sustain the weight with less resistance

[smitty121981]

"The building fell symmetrically when all perimeter columns overloaded and failed." Yes! Thank you! Finally! Just when I was about to count you out you go and redeem yourself, that's why I love you so much!

"A kink before this occurred shows that they did not fail simultaneously!" I agree. However, after the formation of the kink, all subsequent failures must have occurred approximately simultaneously to allow for the sustained period of free fall.

[cantonear1968]

And I have given you my answer! I have quoted it for you several times! Repeating the same question over and over a la Bob that has been answered does not mean you are participating in the conversation!

The building fell symmetrically when all perimeter columns overloaded and failed. A kink before this occurred shows that they did not fail simultaneously!

I've repeated this to you multiple times! Why are you incapable of understanding this!?

[cantonear1968]

Who is arguing this Bob? But the period before FFA is GRAVITY working on the weight load of the building causing the perimeter columns to overload and fail. As I stated again and have been over and over and over and over is that THIS was the cause of the failure of the perimeter columns and NOT because FIRE caused them to fail, as you have been repeating!

Why can you NOT understand this!?

[smitty121981]

"Right about what Smitty?" Goddammit, this is like the tenth time I've typed this for you. It should be obvious to everyone by now that you are only interested in arguing, not conversing!

AGAIN:

The collapse displayed TWO distinct symmetries, including translational symmetry and reflective symmetry. Whether or not the collapse was symmetrical IS in dispute, but you have NOT said if you agree with the two symmetries I described!

[hgfbob]

"Or GRAVITY Einstein"

[shakes head AGAIN....]

no EINSTEIN.....The NIST WTC7 Fig 3-15 shows the graph if you want to see it. They give the regression line yielding acceleration of 32.196ft/s^2. But just to clarify, the time interval between 1.75 and 4 is 2.25 sec. Ergo, it does achieve free-fall during that time. Ergo, for any bending, crushing, breaking connections is happening WITHOUT the potential energy of bldg. Zero resistance.

[cantonear1968]

"uhm.....there is NO collapse till AFTER the kink forms"

Which means that for a kink to form there must have been failure in the perimeter columns at different intervals! If they all failed simultaneously then no kink would have formed!

Why do you clowns not understand this?