Top Comments
All Comments (17)
-
You know, that "poll" may have been cooked up by the newspaper.
-
recounts fix the problem as far as I can read.
-
Bloomberg: "Fraud" behind low Obama vote in New York
-
She won by 1% counting all the republicans that voted for her. rush limbaugh was urging republicans to vote for her.
-
We went to Indiana on a shoe sting just so you know and spent very little money! If you have something to add to the debate why don't you post your own story? Seriously please do, The Real News needs your support! Eamonn
-
Demographics no doubt, but people are tired.
Yet, if the percentages are close remember that the USA votes on machines. The votes are not matter, they are virtual, and can be tricked and are unverifiable.
They did it with Ron Paul when some counties didn't 1 single vote of him, contrasting with high numbers of voters in those counties.
-
It seems fixed to me throughout. Why lose when you can cheat. Look at how Sen. OBamama has been funded compared to hillary and then ask how could she possibly win. Politicians are nothing if not conspiratorial and into collusional methodology. Of course she doesn't need campaign money if the thing is fixed.
-
Another story (although picked up by other media) that could replace this nonsense coverage may be the effects of Indiana's voter ID law and how this disenfranchises the poor in spite of the complete absence of voter fraud at the individual level.
The pattern seems to be clear now. Clinton is banking on uneducated "whites" who are frustrated about their financial situations and more prone to harbor racist attitudes and hostilities, especially when they feel insecure. She and the media calls them thw "white working class" to sugarcoat the facts. Free "white" people who use their minds do not allow Clinton types and the media to mock them in that manner. The question is how many of them can see beyond the deceit.
seeker4truth 3 years ago 4
Now that's a story the Real News should be covering!
burningice17 3 years ago 3