NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams Review WII

GT NiGHTS: Journey of Dreams Review WII
This is not my video.
For a score from me 8/10.
It was decent it could have improved on alot of things.

Category:

Entertainment

Tags:

• NiGHTS:
• Journey
• of
• Dreams
• Review
• WII
• GT
• gt
• nights

[iluvmusic4eva1]

I'm 15 years old and I got the game when I was 12.

Personally I did find the controls quite irritating but I got used to them after a short while.

I did love the game though :') It had a lot of fun with it and found myself fixated with it. I mean compared to all the games like Call of Duty and AC obviously it would rate much lower, but for a female preteen with not much gaming experience I found it worth the money I paid (£32, I did purchase it within it's release).

[segalink]

@iluvmusic4eva1 Being 15 as well,

Getting the game last year, for $10.

definitely getting my worth out it.

I loved this game a lot! (maybe a little too much)

[Naomi0111]

well, i just bought this and have to say its actually a brill game!.Im 31 and loved the original on Saturn,but the only letdown is the washed out graphics and framerate issues.Apart from that it's well worth the £10 i paid for it!.

[segalink]

i just recentaly got a saturn and nights i have not played the new one but i bet i would like the older one better

[natejac99]

okay who thinkss younghenry 101 is an idiot

[bengalz3]

I just bought this game off e bay for 7$!

[bonestorm99]

These graphics look too realistic for a game like this. The colors and textures were way more exciting on the saturn...

[TidusAbes]

is it just me or is this game a litte scary for kids? look at the character face at 3:17

[darklordprophecy]

ok first of all, can I trip out? I was 7 years old when I played the first on my Sega Saturn. come many years later (dude I'm 20) I now find out this boy's name is William Taylor!? that's like...... my name! and the kid looks a lot like me O.O I feel special.

[DarkprinX2500]

lol at :050

[TornadoCreator]

@MyHumanLife

This is why I like people like Angry Joe who uses the entire range of numbers in his rating. When I see home-made reviewers describing how they don't really like a game, it's OK, worth renting at best... then they give it a 7.3 out of 10, to me, they may as well have given it a "banana.mongoose out of stilleto" because those numbers loose all meaning. 7.3 is bad? The fuck.... what do you have to do to get a 3 out of 10... beat the reviewer half dead with his own pet dog?

[MyHumanLife]

@TornadoCreator Oh yea, I definitely agree. It's kind of a ridiculous system, in my opinion. And yea, that fact that there's no real range on it really hurts things, and makes it harder for games that are above-average that are worth trying out to stand apart from the pack. Gaming sites really need to rethink their rating systems.

[TornadoCreator]

@MyHumanLife

OK, that actually makes sense. The thing is, outside of USA where we have different educational systems, it doesn't make any sense. Now sure I can see the logic of making the system relative to what people are familiar with, but it makes it hard to distinguish what's worthwhile because on that scale 8 is "slightly above average" and 9 is "really good", there's no range, also nothing below a 6 is ever used making those numbers essencially pointless. Outside of USA this is senseless.

[MyHumanLife]

@TornadoCreator 7 is considered average, since 5 would be the same as 50%, which is a failing grade.